Abstract:AI code generation tools have expanded software creation beyond professional developers, giving rise to vibe coding, a practice in which users generate software via natural-language prompts, evaluate outputs primarily by execution. Prior work has examined how AI code generation tools support programming tasks within specific user groups, typically professional developers, leaving open the question of how vibe coding practices differ across experience levels. We address this gap by surveying 162 vibe coders belonging to three user experience groups: non-coders, novices, and professional developers. Our results show that experience selectively shapes vibe coding. Reported experiences and perceptions of code quality are broadly similar across groups, with all three recognising both the strengths and limitations of vibe coding. In contrast, motivations, interaction styles, and quality assurance practices diverge with experience. Non-developers are most motivated by accessibility, novices emphasise learning and experimentation, and professionals use vibe coding more frequently in work-related contexts. We synthesise these findings as a perception--action gap: a general awareness of risks in AI-generated code is broadly distributed, but the capacity to evaluate, debug, and verify remains experience-dependent. We show that vibe coding is partially democratising as it broadens access to software creation without equally distributing the expertise to evaluate it.
| Subjects: | Software Engineering (cs.SE) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.24521 [cs.SE] |
| (or arXiv:2605.24521v1 [cs.SE] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.24521 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
From: Amjed Tahir [view email]
[v1]
Sat, 23 May 2026 11:18:11 UTC (2,907 KB)
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理，仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。