惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

WordPress大学
WordPress大学
O
OpenAI News
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
Webroot Blog
Webroot Blog
GbyAI
GbyAI
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
Exploit-DB.com RSS Feed
Exploit-DB.com RSS Feed
J
Java Code Geeks
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
博客园 - 【当耐特】
S
Secure Thoughts
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
AWS News Blog
AWS News Blog
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
S
Security Affairs
H
Help Net Security
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
D
DataBreaches.Net
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
Spread Privacy
Spread Privacy
T
Threatpost
Forbes - Security
Forbes - Security
C
Cisco Blogs
Scott Helme
Scott Helme
Attack and Defense Labs
Attack and Defense Labs
Simon Willison's Weblog
Simon Willison's Weblog
腾讯CDC
The Last Watchdog
The Last Watchdog
Cloudbric
Cloudbric
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
Recorded Future
Recorded Future
小众软件
小众软件
V
Vulnerabilities – Threatpost
美团技术团队
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
Hacker News - Newest:
Hacker News - Newest: "LLM"
I
Intezer
月光博客
月光博客
C
Cyber Attacks, Cyber Crime and Cyber Security
博客园 - 司徒正美
C
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
博客园 - 聂微东

The Atlantic

A White House Makeover, Brought to You by Struggling National Parks Darwin’s Story Isn’t as Simple as It Seems The White House Is the New Green Zone Spencer Pratt’s Reality-TV Playbook The Trump Administration Wants to Frighten Would-Be Whistleblowers How Spain Avoided the Global Populist Backlash The Plight of the Radical’s Children Use It or Lose It Is Socialism the Answer to D.C.’s Woes? Memories of Green Trump’s 250th Celebration Is a Fiasco Los Angeles Voters Have No Good Option Have People Over! The Scariest Monster on Broadway Seven Books You’ll Never Outgrow The Arc of the Voting Rights Act The Hardest Things to Say to One Another Trump’s Approach to Global Leadership The Social Sciences Are in Trouble Pope Leo Is Challenging Much More Than Big Tech How to Make the End of World War II Feel Like a Surprise America Has a Pangram Problem A Crisis of Agency Trump Hasn’t Left Much Kennedy Center to Stay Open The War Trump Can’t End The Apple Car Is Finally Here Democrats Can Do Better Than Graham Platner Why Everyone Hates AI Data Centers Is That Song Stuck in Your Head Actually AI? The Books Briefing: A Book I Wish I’d Read at 22 Photos of the Week: Memorial Day, Spelling Bee, Cheese Rolling ‘The Testaments’: Don’t Follow This Tradwife Curriculum When the President Takes a Cut Trump Lame Duck Status May Have Already Arrived The Trump DOJ Takes a Newly Brazen Step A ‘Promising Democracy’ That Can’t Stop Fighting Itself The U.S. Is Proving the Case for the WHO Words of War Why Aren’t Oil Prices Even Higher? The King of Queens That’s No Way to Run a Railroad History Repeats in Cuba ‘Has He Been Drugged?’ How ‘Hacks’ Redefined Greatness The Lag Between an Iran Deal and Lower Oil Prices ‘We Have Not Seen Ugly Yet’ A Frustrated President Can’t Get the Deal Done America Is Missing Out on the Ultimate Mosquito Weapon The Last of the Jazz Titans Has Trump Corrupted the Military? Images From Yellowstone: America’s First National Park John Cornyn Lost With His Boots Off The Pope’s Defense of Human Imperfection The Allure of the Anti-Screen-Time Toy The Largest Undocumented Disparity in Maternal Health How The Pope's AI Encyclical Defends Humanism Why Iran’s Leaders Think They’ve Won Seven Books to Read Before You Turn 22 The Gas-Tax Reckoning The ‘Backrooms’ Director Found Hell in Empty Hallways Atlantic Trivia, May 27, 2026: Portmanteaus Does Donald Trump Know Men Are Also Allowed to Leave His Cabinet? The Iran Deal Is in the Hands of a Terrible Negotiator The Advice I Hope You’ll Never Need Welcome to the Injection Age The Phrase I Texted My Kids 133 Times Where Are America’s Ambassadors? The Great Depopulation The Antitrust Theory of Everything The Sporting Event Where Everyone Is Doping The Burden They Carry The Magician of the Kremlin I Now Believe Our National Debt Is a Problem Trump’s War Is Staggering to an Incoherent Defeat Why Trump Lost How to Break Cuba The Republican Psychedelics Whisperer The Kardashian-Industrial Complex Americans Refuse To Be Happy A Perfect Show That Doesn’t Make Sense The Unfilmable Author Everyone Should Read This Summer AI-Writing Scandals Are Getting Very Confusing Hegseth’s Leadership of the U.S. Military Putin Can No Longer Hide His Catastrophe The Meanest Tradition in Entertainment Don’t Put Too Much Pressure on Your Summer Vacation Ode to Miller Lite The Real Lesson of Elon Musk’s Outrage at Christopher Nolan There’s Never Been a Better Time to Study Computer Science Barney Frank Was Like No One Else College Should Be Way More Fun Why College Students Are Booing AI Why Would Europeans Believe Trump Now? Some Lawmakers Want a Gerrymandering Truce The Sudden Chumminess of Hunter Biden and Candace Owens Tulsi Gabbard Takes the Exit Ramp The Ahmadinejad Option How Trump’s Culture War Derailed the Women’s History Museum <em>The Sheep Detectives</em> Is More Than Just Fluff The Surprising Lesson of the <em>Granta</em> Controversy
The Politics of the Instagram Story
Annie Joy Williams · 2026-06-28 · via The Atlantic

A couple of years ago, an old flame of mine had the nerve to start dating a new woman. He had posted a photo with her on Instagram; they were wrapped around each other, smiling, with a cheeky caption that I took to be some sort of lovers’ inside joke. I clicked on her username. She had a public Instagram account, so I was free to peruse her photos until I reached her high-school graduation, or until I made myself cry, whichever came first. I noticed she’d posted an Instagram story that day. It was the only bit of content I couldn’t access without revealing myself—users can see a list of everyone who opens their stories. So I did what any sane woman would do. I logged back in to my dead dog’s Instagram account and looked.

“Hidden lurkers,” as one TikTok user put it, are either in luck or damned: Instagram announced earlier this month that it will be rolling out a new paid subscription called Instagram Plus. For only $3.99 a month, users can access a slew of dismal new features, including the ability to “preview stories without appearing on the viewer list,” as the ads say. Other features include an option to shirk the burdens of online popularity by searching your story viewers for a specific person, instead of scrolling through all the names you don’t actually care about; insights into how many times people rewatched your story; and “story extend,” which allows you to set a story to expire in 48 hours as opposed to the usual 24, in case that special someone hasn’t viewed it yet.

All of this is “designed to give you more of what you love about Instagram,” the app claims, helping you “express yourself, connect deeper with friends, and customize your experience.” If what you love is the ability to more conveniently keep tabs on crushes or enemies, by which I mean torture yourself, then Instagram nailed it. Instagram Plus is social media’s newest low—a company preying on our most pathetic impulses, for the price of a small iced coffee.

Instagram Plus isn’t just a sign of what’s gone wrong with social media, but also with modern romance. The app has become a quintessential cog in the dating machine—especially in those liminal stages, the flirtations and the breakups. It provides yet another way to try to create narratives about one another, if mainly by providing meaningless data to back up our least logical hypotheses. If my ex views my story, it must mean he’s still invested in my life. Right?

Any single person who even passively uses the app can tell you that it has added a new level of torment to their love life. Since Instagram was founded, in 2010, the brokenhearted and heart-eyed alike have pored over which pictures to post to attract a particular person’s attention. Things got worse in August 2016, when Instagram created stories to imitate its competitor, Snapchat, which offered users the chance to post any regrettable content for 24 hours before it vanished, filed away somewhere in the endless Internet annals of potentially blackmail-worthy content. Suddenly, Instagram went from a place to document “what were you doing to what are you doing right now,” Caitlin Begg, a sociologist and the founder of the research lab Authentic Social, told me. “It was one thing to see a Facebook album pop up after a weekend, but now to be seeing all these everyday moments of people’s lives definitely changes the way we’re perceiving things.”

Courtney Tracy, a therapist known on Instagram as “Dr. Courtney” who focuses on attachment issues, told me the surfeit of information about other people’s behavior can make us jump to ridiculous conclusions. “We get overloaded,” she said, and our brains try to take back control by coming up with our own explanations for that behavior. “And most of the time, we’re not right.”

If you’ve never been lovesick and delusional in the age of Instagram, let me fill you in on the crazy things people do. I have spent hours scrolling through story viewers to see if an ex had seen my post, as if having his eyes on an image of my breakfast might make him change his mind about me. One woman I know has memorized everyone an ex follows, and routinely checks to see if the count has gone up so she can try to figure out who he’s added—in case it’s a beautiful woman. She wasn’t even that excited about Instagram Plus. “Tell me when they let you view who someone follows chronologically,” she said.

A number of people I spoke with had fine-tuned the art of targeting their stories to specific viewers. Some of them post stories to “close friends,” a feature that lets you narrow who can see a story down to a targeted group or even—unbenownst to him—one person. This is an especially helpful tactic for a hot photo. One woman told me that, although she has blocked her ex-boyfriend from seeing her Instagram, his family still follows her. She usually hides her stories from them, but not when she posts wholesome content, such as a photo of her holding a friend’s baby. Maybe they’ll see and tell her ex that she really would have made the best mother.

Lots of people ask to borrow their friends’ phones or create burner accounts to continue to look at the profile of someone they’ve blocked or who’s blocked them, or to avoid getting caught looking at their stories. I used to lend my phone to a friend so she could see who her ex was following. She’d always pan the phone toward me whenever she saw a new woman who seemed like his type. “You’re prettier,” I’d assure her, while questioning my feminism.

The Instagram-story obsession doesn’t apply to only romantic relationships. “I’ve had entire hour-long sessions with clients just talking about why their ex–best friend is viewing their Instagram story every day, but not liking any of their posts,” Tracy told me. “You can start to ruminate or overthink about the actual relationship you have with that person, when sometimes, it’s just really not that deep.”

Most of the people I spoke with said they wouldn’t bother subscribing to Instagram Plus. But a number of them said that they would feel differently if they’d recently gone through a breakup. Both Tracy and Begg worried about the app preying on vulnerable people in exactly that situation, as well as those who struggle with attachment disorders, OCD, or sensitivity to rejection.

It’s not good for anyone, Tracy said, to “know where people are, what they’re doing, who they’re with; it can create these obsessive tendencies where it’s just a lot healthier to have some blank canvas in your mind.” She predicted the features would “increase anxiety, stalking behaviors, and time on social media, which is obviously what the platforms are going for.”

Begg was particularly concerned about being able to peek at people’s stories anonymously. The use of burner accounts, she said, at least creates a sort of shame ritual that encourages you to step back and think, Should I really be viewing this story? That friction is an opportunity for self-reflection. It helps stop people from acting on behavior that could easily become compulsive.

Exactly how much of this tantalizing material can you secretly access for $3.99? In an explanatory video, Adam Mosseri, Instagram’s CEO, said that you can get “a little preview of someone else’s story—not the full thing, but just a preview—by long-pressing on it.” (Here he raises one thumb to demonstrate the long-press maneuver.) This seems, if anything, deliberately obscure. Lots of stories consist of a single photo: How do you “preview” that without simply viewing the photo? Regardless, Tracy summed the issue up: “If the purpose is to be social, why are we looking anonymously?”

The genius of social media is that these companies know all of the secret things we won’t admit we deeply want to do. The danger is that they let us do them. “There’s a pattern that we’ve seen with these social-media companies saying, Let’s find out what their behavior is, and let’s make it easier for them to do it despite the psychological repercussions,” Tracy said.

Instagram Plus is rolling out gradually, but it will surely expand. Maybe the price will go up. Maybe more options will be added. Maybe—almost definitely—we’ll spend more time online driving ourselves insane.

If that sounds good to you, then definitely sign up for what Mosseri called these “fun little extra features.”