惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

V
V2EX
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
罗磊的独立博客
小众软件
小众软件
I
InfoQ
Y
Y Combinator Blog
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
博客园 - 聂微东
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
H
Help Net Security
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
博客园_首页
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
P
Proofpoint News Feed
博客园 - 司徒正美
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Jina AI
Jina AI
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium

Android Authority

I know YouTube Music is flawed, yet I prefer it over Spotify Survey reveals 50% of users don’t like the new Google Health app It’s time for Samsung’s S Pen to evolve or die The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2026) is a sequel we didn’t need NotebookLM is quickly becoming the podcast app I didn’t know I needed Samsung’s next Galaxy Watch update could finally make your health data useful Google’s Gemini Spark is ready to run your digital errands while your phone is off Telegram’s finally getting an official Wear OS app again Nintendo is back on mobile, and it wants to turn your selfies into minigames Google Drive’s big document scanner overhaul is finally here — don’t overlook its power Spotify will finally give you real profile tools to make music listening more social Acer’s new gaming handheld might dodge the worst of tech inflation Meta is cooking up a new line of smart glasses, and they may not be Ray-Bans ChatGPT is retiring this beloved legacy model in June Is Microsoft Copilot not working? Here’s what’s going on (Update: Back up) Samsung Gallery starts quietly ending OneDrive support ahead of schedule Here’s a first look at custom wallpapers in Google Messages Rivian is pretty sure customers want AI, not Android Auto Leaked iPhone 18 Pro dummy units may have just shown the next Android phone color trend A company spent $500 million in one month after forgetting to set AI usage limits Now even MediaTek’s cheap chips are embarrassing the Tensor G5 in one major area Pixel 10 Pro XL user says Google returned their phone worse than dead The best robot pool cleaners of 2026: Top picks for all budgets and pool sizes Claude Opus 4.8 is more honest, less deceptive, and considerably cheaper Roborock’s Qrevo Curv 2 Flow is ready to mop up the competition — and your filthy floors Google is making it easier to share Gemini chats, media, and more with your team One UI 9 borrows one of the iPhone’s most useful call features This is the biggest mistake Oura is making with the Oura Ring 5 This Verizon user owed $400, but the carrier made an unexpected move Google’s Fitbit Air makes a strong case for minimalism and ditching your smartwatch
The fast-charging wars are over. Now it’s time to fix USB-C
Robert Triggs · 2026-06-13 · via Android Authority
infinitylab instantgo power banks charging iphone 12 pro

Ryan Haines / Android Authority

You don’t have to be an old timer to remember when charging power was once a major differential for the best smartphones. The long march to 40W charging quickly spiraled into a spec war that spawned countless rival standards: HyperCharge, SuperVOOC, SuperCharge, Samsung AFC, Apple 2.4A. and Qualcomm’s Quick Charge as options for brands unable to build their own. It was a mess, and we’ve been dealing with the fallout ever since when trying to buy fast-charging accessories for all our gadgets.

Eventually, the universal USB Power Delivery specification caught up in raw power in the USB-C era, but this was further complicated by branching enhancements such as EDR for laptops and PPS for low-power devices. It’s taken years for the standard to reach capabilities that match what rival proprietary standards have long offered. Thankfully, we’re now at the point where the power wars are over; it’s time to consolidate around the sensible universal option.

Do you still find USB-C fast charging a headache?

570 votes

If you look at the past two or three generations of the fastest-charging phones, power levels have plateaued. While you’ll still find the odd marketing claim breaching the 100W barrier, 60-80W of real deliverable power appears to be the most that we can throw at our compact smartphone batteries. And that’s plenty fast, too. Even the largest 7,000 mAh phone batteries can be fully charged in about 40 minutes.

2026 flagship phone charging power

Robert Triggs / Android Authority

There are stragglers, of course. Samsung’s Galaxy S26 Ultra has only recently closed the gap on the industry’s fastest, but the popular iPhone and Pixel series remain some way behind. This is especially true when we look outside the top-of-the-range flagship — baseline models are often notably slower.

Still, peel back the numbers, and there’s something more important at play. The fastest charging phones are increasingly less dependent on their proprietary protocols to achieve fast charging times and power (which is seldom sustained for more than a few minutes anyway). We’re now at the point where universal standards have caught the proprietary models and offer broader accessory compatibility to boot.

The fastest charging phones are increasingly less dependent on proprietary protocols.

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is an extreme example, promising up to 90W over the everyday USB Power Delivery PPS specification. Likewise, the OnePlus 15 and OPPO Find X9 Ultra can hit above 40W via PPS as well, with only a minor impact on full charge times. The key factor is that the average power draw during fast charging is often well below 40W, regardless of whether you use SuperVOOC or Power Delivery.

OPPO Find X9 Pro 80W SuperVOOC vs 45W USB PD PPS

Companies keep messing with a simple spec

motorola edge plus turbopower

Ryan Haines / Android Authority

Unfortunately, it’s too early to celebrate just yet. The mess that is the USB charging landscape means that even consolidating around Power Delivery remains a challenge. Today, even if two phones can receive more than 50W under this universal specification, it doesn’t mean consumers will easily achieve it when they shop for third-party chargers and power banks.

For example, Motorola’s TurboPower spec is based on the USB PD specification but requires a special E-marked USB-C cable rated at 6.5A to reach its 60W rating. Fail that test and you’re stuck with sluggish power rates. Google’s Pixel 10 Pro XL throws a spanner in the works by working nicely with 9V/3A charging for 27W but requiring a 20V/1.6A-capable plug to hit their peak 37W.

Picking the right charger and cable remains a headache.

Even within Samsung’s pretty decent ecosystem, 9V/5A and 16V/3A are used to achieve 45W charging, depending on the model, and you’ll need a different cable for the 5A option. Picking the right USB-C charger and cable can still be a problem even within the same ecosystem. Apple hasn’t helped the situation by moving towards USB PD AVS for optimized iPhone 17 charging rather than Android’s pick of USB PD PPS — though at least it retains compatibility with the main standard.

So how does this problem get fixed?

The next battleground is interoperability, not speed

Google 67W charger USB PD support

Robert Triggs / Android Authority

The good news is that the technical foundations already exist. USB Power Delivery PPS can dynamically adjust voltage and current to closely mirror the behavior of many proprietary charging standards. In practice, that means manufacturers no longer need entirely separate ecosystems to deliver fast, battery-friendly charging.

The challenge is that companies continue to implement the standard differently. Different voltage profiles, current limits, cable requirements, and certification programs create friction where there should be simplicity. Consumers shouldn’t need to understand the difference between 9V/5A and 20V/2A, PPS ranges, E-marker requirements, or AVS support just to buy a charger that works at full speed. And that’s another problem: brands continue to be terrible at signifying when a device is actually charging optimally.

Fortunately, manufacturers aren’t the only stakeholders pushing the industry toward consistency. If phone makers won’t standardize voluntarily, the accessory market might well do it for them.

Charging speeds plateaued, but interoperability remains a challenge.

Proprietary standards are already seldom supported by third-party power banks and plugs, which has helped push the market toward USB Power Delivery. There’s also been a gradual increase in support for both higher-voltage PPS capabilities and Apple’s AVS implementation, helping modern chargers cover more devices than ever before. However, this is often reserved only for the more expensive models.

Ultimately, a charger that powers a laptop, tablet, phone, earbuds, and a portable gaming device is far more appealing than one optimized for a single smartphone brand. The paradigm is thankfully shifting; it’s no longer about buying the right charger for a specific device, but about finding the one that powers all your gadgets. Unfortunately, that still requires busywork and more knowledge than most consumers should be expected to have, but it’s becoming slightly easier each year.

The industry has spent more than a decade fighting over charging standards. With charging speeds now largely plateaued, interoperability remains the final challenge. The next phase isn’t about reaching 150W or 200W — it’s about ensuring that any decent USB-C charger can deliver the performance consumers expect, regardless of the logo on the phone.

Thank you for being part of our community. Read our Comment Policy before posting.