惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

S
Secure Thoughts
P
Privacy International News Feed
T
Tenable Blog
L
Lohrmann on Cybersecurity
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
S
Securelist
C
CXSECURITY Database RSS Feed - CXSecurity.com
Cisco Talos Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
T
The Exploit Database - CXSecurity.com
S
Schneier on Security
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
Vercel News
Vercel News
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
月光博客
月光博客
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
Scott Helme
Scott Helme
爱范儿
爱范儿
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
C
Cisco Blogs
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
博客园 - 司徒正美
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
P
Proofpoint News Feed
A
Arctic Wolf
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
L
LangChain Blog
C
Cyber Attacks, Cyber Crime and Cyber Security
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
Simon Willison's Weblog
Simon Willison's Weblog
T
Tor Project blog
Security Latest
Security Latest
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
G
GRAHAM CLULEY
V
Vulnerabilities – Threatpost
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
I
InfoQ
Spread Privacy
Spread Privacy
B
Blog RSS Feed
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
C
CERT Recently Published Vulnerability Notes
A
About on SuperTechFans
博客园_首页
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
Project Zero
Project Zero
Latest news
Latest news

Crazyrouter Blog (English)

Ideogram AI Guide 2026: Product Mockups, Text Rendering, and API Automation Akool AI Voice Generator Review 2026: API Alternatives for Developers GLM 4.6 API Guide 2026: Build Chinese-English Agents with Tool Calling Google Veo3 API Guide 2026: Batch Video Generation, QA, and Fallbacks AI Lip Sync Tools Comparison 2026: Developer Guide for Localization Pipelines Claude Opus 4.8 vs Opus 4.7: Real API Benchmark Results for Developers Opus 4.8 vs Opus 4.7 Coding Test: What Changed for Developers? Opus 4.8 vs Opus 4.7 for Agents: JSON, Tool Use, and Structured Output Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite for RAG, Agent Routing, and Cost per Successful Task Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite for Support Automation and Ticket Triage Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Use Cases: The Practical Automation Tier for Developers Claude Jupiter v1-p vs GPT-5.5 Benchmark: Real API Test on Reasoning and Coding Claude Jupiter v1-p vs Claude Opus 4.7 vs Sonnet 4.6: Live API Test Claude Jupiter v1-p vs Claude Opus 4.7 vs Sonnet 4.6: Live API Test Claude Code Pricing 2026: Pro vs Max vs Team vs API Costs Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: Real API Compatibility and Coding Benchmark Gemini CLI Complete Guide 2026: Repo Automation, CI Agents, and Multi-Model Routing Ideogram AI Guide 2026: Brand Design Automation, API Workflows, and Alternatives GLM 4.6 API Guide 2026: Agents, RAG, Tool Calling, and Bilingual Apps WAN 2.2 Animate Tutorial 2026: Character Consistency, Shot Control, and API Workflows Google Veo3 API Guide 2026: Production Video Pipelines, Prompts, Pricing, and Fallbacks AI API Pricing Comparison 2026: Text, Image, Video, Caching, and Router Costs Codex CLI Installation Guide 2026: Windows, macOS, Linux, Proxies, and CI Setup How to Get a Claude API Key in 2026: Secure Setup for Teams, CI, and Alternatives Gemini Advanced Review 2026: Is It Worth It for Coding, Research, and API Teams? Claude Code Pricing Guide 2026: Team Agent Budgets, API Fallbacks, and Cost Control Seedance 2.0 Pricing: Convert 46 CNY per Million Tokens to Cost per Second Qwen2.5-Omni Guide 2026: Real-Time Voice, Vision, and Multimodal Agents Kimi K2 Thinking Guide 2026: Reasoning Workflows, Evals, and Cost Control Google Veo3 API Guide 2026: Batch Video Pipelines, Pricing, and Fallbacks Codex CLI Installation Guide 2026: macOS, Linux, WSL, Proxies, and Dev Containers How to Get a Claude API Key in 2026: Safe Production Setup and Alternatives AI API Pricing Comparison 2026: GPT, Claude, Gemini, Video, and Agent Workloads Gemini Advanced Review 2026: Is It Worth It for Developer Teams? Claude Code Pricing Guide 2026: API Fallbacks, Team Seats, and Budget Control Seedream 4.0 API Tutorial 2026: Batch Image Generation, Product Creative, and Pricing Qwen2.5-Omni Guide 2026: Real-Time Voice, Vision, Text Agents, and API Integration Kimi K2 Thinking Guide 2026: Reasoning Agents, Evaluation Workflows, and API Cost Control WAN 2.2 Animate Tutorial 2026: Character Motion, Shot Control, API Pipelines, and Pricing Google Veo3 API Guide 2026: Production Video Workflows, Prompts, Pricing, and Fallbacks AI API Pricing Comparison 2026: OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, and Router Costs How to Get a Claude API Key in 2026: Setup, Security, Rotation, and Alternatives Codex CLI Installation Guide 2026: macOS, Linux, WSL, Proxies, and Devcontainers Gemini Advanced Review 2026: Is It Worth It for Developers and API Builders? Claude Code Pricing Guide 2026: CI Agents, Team Seats, and API Budget Planning AI API Gateway for Singapore and Malaysia Developers: One Endpoint for GPT, Claude and Gemini AI API Gateway for Thai Developers: Use GPT, Claude and Gemini with One Key One API Key for GPT, Claude and Gemini: A Practical Setup for Central Asia Developers Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Response-Tier Models: Which One Should Developers Use? Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Gemini 3 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Flash: Real API Benchmark "How to Test Multiple AI Image Models with One API Key" Codex CLI Installation Guide: Setup on macOS, Linux, Windows WSL and CI/CD Seedream 4.0 API Tutorial: ByteDance Image Generation for Production Pipelines Kimi K2 Thinking Model: Complete Developer Guide for Reasoning Workflows Luma Ray 2 Review: AI Video Generation Quality, Speed, and API Guide Pika 2.2 New Features Review: Scene Director, Sound Design, and API Updates Google Veo 3 API Guide: Video Generation with Audio for Developers AI Lip Sync Tools Comparison 2026: Best APIs for Talking Avatars and Video Dubbing Gemini Advanced Review May 2026: Is It Worth $20/Month for AI Power Users? Claude Code Pricing in May 2026: Max Plan, Opus 4, and Real Cost Breakdown Hermes Agent + Crazyrouter: One-Click Setup for 627+ AI Models Text-Embedding-3-Small: Complete Guide to OpenAI's Most Popular Embedding Model (2026) AI Meme Generator & Coloring Book Creator with GPT-image-2 — Fun Projects That Actually Make Money AI Future Baby Prediction with GPT-image-2 — See What Your Child Might Look Like Ghibli Style Photo Transformation with GPT-image-2 — Turn Any Photo Into Anime Art AI Action Figure Generator with GPT-image-2 — Turn Anyone Into a Boxed Toy AI Face Reading & Personal Color Analysis with GPT-image-2 — Two Viral Use Cases in One Guide AI Palm Reading with GPT-image-2 — Generate Professional Palmistry Analysis from a Single Photo Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Pricing Explained — The Cheapest Gemini Model for High-Volume Workloads Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pricing Explained — Caching, Tiers, and How to Save 45% with Crazyrouter Gemini Free vs Gemini Advanced: Pricing, Limits, Features, and Is It Worth Paying For? AI Context Window Comparison (2026): GPT, Claude, Gemini Token Limits by Model Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pricing Explained — Caching, Batch API, and How to Save 45% with Crazyrouter Claude Opus 4.7 Pricing Explained — New Tokenizer, Caching, and How to Save 45% with Crazyrouter Claude Opus 4.6 Pricing Explained — Caching, Tiers, and How to Save 45% with Crazyrouter Best AI Models for RAG Applications 2026: Embeddings, Retrieval, and Generation Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 2.1 vs Runway Gen 4 Turbo: Video AI API Comparison 2026 AI Video Generation API Pricing May 2026: Veo3 vs Kling vs Runway vs Sora How to Get Claude API Key in China 2026: Complete Setup Guide AI Coding Tools ROI Calculator: Claude Code vs Codex CLI vs Gemini CLI Cost Analysis 2026 AI API Pricing Comparison May 2026 - Complete Developer Guide Grok 4 API Pricing Complete Guide 2026 DeepSeek R2: The 32B Reasoning Model That Runs on a Single GPU — Complete Guide for Developers "GPT-5.1 Codex Max Pricing Explained — The Code-Specialized Model and How to Save with Crazyrouter" GPT-4o Pricing Explained — The Legacy Flagship That's Still Worth Using GLM-5 Pricing Explained — Zhipu AI's Flagship Model and How to Access via Crazyrouter Gemini 3 Flash Pricing Explained — Balanced Speed and Cost with Crazyrouter Savings "Gemini 3.1 Pro Pricing Explained — Context Tiers, Caching, and How to Save with Crazyrouter" GPT-5.5 Pricing Explained — OpenAI's Latest Flagship, Reasoning Tokens, and How to Save with Crazyrouter AI Model Pricing Guide 2026: What Every Model Costs on Crazyrouter (and How Much You Save) MiniMax M2 Pricing Explained — China's Competitive AI Model and How to Access via Crazyrouter Grok 4.1 Pricing Explained — 2M Context, Caching, Tool Costs, and How to Save with Crazyrouter GPT-5 Pricing Explained — Reasoning Tokens, Caching, Batch API, and How to Save with Crazyrouter GPT-5-nano Pricing Explained — The Cheapest GPT Model for High-Throughput Workloads GPT-5-mini Pricing Explained — Ultra-Low Cost AI with Caching and Batch Discounts GPT-5.4 Pricing Explained — Cached Input, Context Tiers, Batch API, and How to Save with Crazyrouter GPT-5.2 Pricing Explained — Caching, Batch API, and How to Save with Crazyrouter OpenRouter vs Crazyrouter (2026): Pricing, Models, and Which API Gateway Fits Developers Better Suno v4 vs v5 vs v4.5: Which Version Sounds Better and Is Worth Using in 2026? How to Use Claude Code with Crazyrouter: Base URL Setup, Model Routing, and Cost Savings
Grok 4.1 Thinking Pricing Explained — Reasoning Tokens, Caching, and How to Save with Crazyrouter
Crazyrouter Team · 2026-04-27 · via Crazyrouter Blog (English)

Grok 4.1 Thinking Pricing Explained — Reasoning Tokens, Caching, and How to Save with Crazyrouter#

xAI's Grok 4.1 Thinking is the reasoning-enhanced variant of the Grok 4.1 model family. It extends the already capable Grok 4.1 base model with chain-of-thought reasoning — the model "thinks" through problems step by step before producing a final answer. This makes it exceptionally strong for math, code generation, logic puzzles, multi-step planning, and any task where deliberate reasoning outperforms pattern matching.

But reasoning comes at a cost. Grok 4.1 Thinking generates reasoning tokens — internal chain-of-thought tokens that are billed at the output token rate but never appear in the final response. If you're not careful, a simple prompt can quietly consume 5–10x more tokens than you expected.

This guide breaks down every component of Grok 4.1 Thinking pricing, explains how reasoning tokens work, shows you how to control costs with caching and the reasoning_effort parameter, and demonstrates how to save an additional 10% by routing through Crazyrouter.

Last updated: April 27, 2026.


Base Pricing#

Here's the official Grok 4.1 Thinking pricing from xAI:

ComponentPrice per Million Tokens
Input tokens$0.20
Cached input tokens$0.05
Output tokens$0.50
Reasoning tokens$0.50 (same as output)

At first glance, these rates look extremely competitive. Input at 0.20/MTokischeaperthanmostfrontiermodels,andoutputat0.20/MTok is cheaper than most frontier models, and output at 0.50/MTok undercuts GPT-5 and Claude Opus 4 significantly. But the real cost story is in the reasoning tokens — more on that below.

Context Window#

Grok 4.1 Thinking supports a 131,072-token context window — the same as the base Grok 4.1 model. The output limit is 65,536 tokens, which includes both visible output tokens and invisible reasoning tokens. This means heavy reasoning can eat into your available output space.


What Are Reasoning Tokens?#

When you send a prompt to Grok 4.1 Thinking, the model doesn't jump straight to an answer. It first generates an internal chain of thought — a sequence of reasoning steps that help it work through the problem. These intermediate steps are called reasoning tokens.

Reasoning tokens are:

  • Generated by the model as part of its thinking process
  • Billed as output tokens at $0.50 per million tokens
  • Not returned in the API response — you don't see them in the content field
  • Reported in the usage object under completion_tokens_details.reasoning_tokens

How Are They Billed?#

Reasoning tokens are billed at the same rate as output tokens: $0.50/MTok. They count toward your total completion_tokens in the usage response.

Here's what a typical usage response looks like:

In this example, the model generated 7,000 reasoning tokens and 1,500 visible output tokens. You're billed for all 8,500 completion tokens at the output rate. The reasoning tokens account for 82% of the output cost — and you never see them.

Why Are Reasoning Tokens So Costly?#

The issue isn't the per-token rate — $0.50/MTok is reasonable. The issue is volume. Reasoning tokens typically outnumber visible output tokens by a factor of 2x to 10x, depending on task complexity:

Task TypeTypical Reasoning:Output RatioExample
Simple Q&A2:1"What's the capital of France?"
Code generation3–5:1"Write a Python function to merge two sorted lists"
Math/logic problems5–8:1"Prove that √2 is irrational"
Complex multi-step reasoning8–10:1"Analyze this codebase and find the bug"

A prompt that generates 500 visible output tokens might silently produce 3,000–5,000 reasoning tokens. Your effective output cost isn't 0.50/MTok—it′scloserto0.50/MTok — it's closer to 2–3/MTok when reasoning is factored in.

Controlling Costs with reasoning_effort#

xAI provides a reasoning_effort parameter that lets you control how much thinking the model does. This directly impacts the number of reasoning tokens generated:

ValueBehaviorReasoning Token Reduction
highFull reasoning (default)Baseline
mediumBalanced reasoning~40–60% fewer reasoning tokens
lowMinimal reasoning~70–80% fewer reasoning tokens

When to use each level:

  • high: Math proofs, complex debugging, multi-step logic, competitive programming
  • medium: General coding tasks, analysis, summarization with nuance
  • low: Simple Q&A, classification, extraction, formatting tasks

Using low for simple tasks can cut your total cost by 60–70% compared to the default high setting. This is the single most impactful cost optimization available.


Caching: Automatic 75% Input Discount#

Grok 4.1 Thinking supports automatic prompt caching. When you send repeated or overlapping prompts, xAI's infrastructure automatically caches the common prefix and charges cached tokens at a reduced rate:

  • Standard input: $0.20/MTok
  • Cached input: $0.05/MTok (75% discount)

Caching is automatic — you don't need to enable it or manage cache keys. The system detects when a new request shares a prefix with a recent request and applies the cached rate.

When Caching Helps Most#

Caching is most effective for:

  • System prompts: If you use the same system prompt across requests, it gets cached after the first call
  • Multi-turn conversations: The conversation history from previous turns is cached
  • Few-shot examples: Static examples in your prompt are cached
  • Document analysis: When asking multiple questions about the same document

Caching Example#

Suppose you have a 10,000-token system prompt and send 50 requests with different user messages:

Without caching:

  • 50 × 10,000 = 500,000 input tokens × 0.20/MTok=0.20/MTok = 0.10

With caching (first request uncached, 49 cached):

  • 1 × 10,000 = 10,000 tokens × 0.20/MTok=0.20/MTok = 0.002
  • 49 × 10,000 = 490,000 tokens × 0.05/MTok=0.05/MTok = 0.0245
  • Total: $0.0265 (73.5% savings)

For high-volume applications with consistent system prompts, caching alone can reduce input costs by 70%+.


Grok 4.1 Thinking supports the same tool/function calling capabilities as the base Grok 4.1 model. There is no additional surcharge for tool use — you pay the standard input and output token rates.

However, tool definitions do consume input tokens. Each tool definition in your request adds to the prompt token count. If you define 20 tools with detailed descriptions, that could add 2,000–5,000 tokens to every request.

Cost optimization tips for tools:

  • Only include tools relevant to the current request
  • Keep tool descriptions concise but clear
  • Use caching to offset the cost of repeated tool definitions
  • Consider whether reasoning_effort="low" is sufficient for tool-routing decisions

Batch API: 50% Off#

xAI offers a Batch API for asynchronous processing at half the standard price:

ComponentStandardBatch (50% off)
Input tokens$0.20/MTok$0.10/MTok
Cached input$0.05/MTok$0.025/MTok
Output tokens$0.50/MTok$0.25/MTok
Reasoning tokens$0.50/MTok$0.25/MTok

Batch requests are processed within a 24-hour window. You submit a JSONL file of requests and poll for results. This is ideal for:

  • Bulk content generation
  • Large-scale data analysis
  • Evaluation and benchmarking
  • Any workload that doesn't need real-time responses

The 50% discount applies to all token types, including reasoning tokens. For reasoning-heavy workloads, the Batch API can reduce your effective cost from ~3/MTokto 3/MTok to ~1.50/MTok.


Save More with Crazyrouter#

Crazyrouter is an OpenAI-compatible API gateway that provides access to Grok 4.1 Thinking (and 200+ other models) at 90% of official pricing — a flat 10% discount on all token costs.

Crazyrouter Pricing for Grok 4.1 Thinking#

ComponentOfficialCrazyrouter (10% off)
Input tokens$0.20/MTok$0.18/MTok
Cached input$0.05/MTok$0.045/MTok
Output tokens$0.50/MTok$0.45/MTok
Reasoning tokens$0.50/MTok$0.45/MTok

Why Crazyrouter?#

  • OpenAI-compatible API: Drop-in replacement — just change the base_url
  • 200+ models: Access Grok, GPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, and more from a single API key
  • 10% discount: On every model, every token, every request
  • No rate limit surprises: Generous rate limits across all models
  • Single billing: One account, one invoice, all providers

Integration: OpenAI Python SDK#

Integration: cURL#

That's it. Change the base URL, use your Crazyrouter API key, and you're saving 10% on every call.


Real-World Cost Scenarios#

Let's walk through three realistic scenarios to see how reasoning tokens, caching, and Crazyrouter affect your bill.

Scenario 1: Simple Chatbot (Low Reasoning)#

Use case: Customer support bot answering FAQ-style questions.

ParameterValue
Reasoning effortlow
Avg input tokens per request800
Avg reasoning tokens per request300
Avg output tokens per request200
Requests per day10,000
Caching hit rate70% (system prompt cached)

Monthly cost calculation (30 days):

  • Input: 300,000 × 0.3 × 0.20+300,000×0.7×0.20 + 300,000 × 0.7 × 0.05 = 18.00+18.00 + 10.50 = $28.50/MTok-adjusted
  • Actually: 10,000 × 800 = 8M tokens/day → 240M tokens/month
    • Uncached (30%): 72M × 0.20/MTok=0.20/MTok = 14.40
    • Cached (70%): 168M × 0.05/MTok=0.05/MTok = 8.40
  • Output + Reasoning: 10,000 × 500 = 5M tokens/day → 150M tokens/month
    • 150M × 0.50/MTok=0.50/MTok = 75.00

Total (official): 97.80/month∗∗Total(Crazyrouter)∗∗:97.80/month **Total (Crazyrouter)**: 88.02/month — save $9.78/month

Scenario 2: Code Assistant (Medium Reasoning)#

Use case: Developer tool that generates and explains code.

ParameterValue
Reasoning effortmedium
Avg input tokens per request3,000
Avg reasoning tokens per request4,000
Avg output tokens per request1,200
Requests per day2,000
Caching hit rate50%

Monthly cost calculation (30 days):

  • Input: 2,000 × 3,000 = 6M tokens/day → 180M tokens/month
    • Uncached (50%): 90M × 0.20/MTok=0.20/MTok = 18.00
    • Cached (50%): 90M × 0.05/MTok=0.05/MTok = 4.50
  • Output + Reasoning: 2,000 × 5,200 = 10.4M tokens/day → 312M tokens/month
    • 312M × 0.50/MTok=0.50/MTok = 156.00

Total (official): 178.50/month∗∗Total(Crazyrouter)∗∗:178.50/month **Total (Crazyrouter)**: 160.65/month — save $17.85/month

Notice how reasoning tokens (4,000) dwarf the visible output (1,200). The output line is 3.3x what you'd expect from visible tokens alone.

Scenario 3: Research Agent (High Reasoning)#

Use case: Autonomous agent solving complex multi-step problems with tool use.

ParameterValue
Reasoning efforthigh
Avg input tokens per request8,000
Avg reasoning tokens per request15,000
Avg output tokens per request2,000
Requests per day500
Caching hit rate40%

Monthly cost calculation (30 days):

  • Input: 500 × 8,000 = 4M tokens/day → 120M tokens/month
    • Uncached (60%): 72M × 0.20/MTok=0.20/MTok = 14.40
    • Cached (40%): 48M × 0.05/MTok=0.05/MTok = 2.40
  • Output + Reasoning: 500 × 17,000 = 8.5M tokens/day → 255M tokens/month
    • 255M × 0.50/MTok=0.50/MTok = 127.50

Total (official): 144.30/month∗∗Total(Crazyrouter)∗∗:144.30/month **Total (Crazyrouter)**: 129.87/month — save $14.43/month

Here, reasoning tokens are 7.5x the visible output. The model is doing serious thinking — and you're paying for every step. If you switched to medium reasoning effort, you could cut the reasoning tokens roughly in half and save ~$60/month.


Grok 4.1 Thinking vs. GPT-5 vs. Claude Opus 4 Reasoning#

How does Grok 4.1 Thinking stack up against other reasoning models?

ModelInput $/MTokOutput $/MTokReasoning RateBatch Discount
Grok 4.1 Thinking$0.20$0.50Same as output ($0.50)50% off
GPT-5$2.00$8.00Same as output ($8.00)50% off
Claude Opus 4$15.00$75.00N/A (extended thinking billed at output)Not available

The pricing gap is dramatic:

  • Grok 4.1 Thinking is 10x cheaper on input and 16x cheaper on output than GPT-5
  • Grok 4.1 Thinking is 75x cheaper on input and 150x cheaper on output than Claude Opus 4

Of course, pricing isn't everything — benchmark performance, latency, and output quality all matter. But for cost-sensitive reasoning workloads, Grok 4.1 Thinking offers an extraordinary value proposition. It's the most affordable frontier reasoning model available today.

When to choose each:

  • Grok 4.1 Thinking: Best value for reasoning tasks, especially at scale. Strong on math, code, and logic.
  • GPT-5: Broader general knowledge, stronger on creative and nuanced tasks. Worth the premium for customer-facing applications.
  • Claude Opus 4: Best-in-class for long-context analysis, complex writing, and tasks requiring deep understanding. Premium pricing reflects premium capability.

Key Takeaways#

  1. Base rates are cheap, but reasoning tokens multiply your costs. A 0.50/MTokoutputratecaneffectivelybecome0.50/MTok output rate can effectively become 2–5/MTok when reasoning tokens are factored in.

  2. Use reasoning_effort aggressively. Set it to low for simple tasks and medium for most workloads. Reserve high for genuinely complex problems.

  3. Caching is free money. Consistent system prompts and multi-turn conversations automatically benefit from 75% input discounts.

  4. Batch API halves everything. If you can tolerate async processing, the 50% discount applies to all token types including reasoning.

  5. Crazyrouter saves 10% on top. An OpenAI-compatible drop-in that requires changing one line of code.

  6. Monitor reasoning_tokens in your usage data. If you're not tracking this field, you're flying blind on costs.

  7. Grok 4.1 Thinking is the most cost-effective reasoning model available. At 10–75x cheaper than GPT-5 and Claude Opus 4, it's the clear choice for budget-conscious reasoning workloads.


Get Started with Crazyrouter#

Ready to use Grok 4.1 Thinking at 10% off?

  1. Sign up at crazyrouter.com
  2. Get your API key from the dashboard
  3. Change your base URL to https://crazyrouter.com/v1
  4. Start saving on every request

Crazyrouter supports 200+ models from xAI, OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, DeepSeek, and more — all through a single OpenAI-compatible API. One key, one bill, every model.

👉 Get your API key at crazyrouter.com


Disclaimer: Pricing information is accurate as of April 27, 2026 and is based on publicly available data from xAI. Prices may change without notice. Crazyrouter is an independent API gateway and is not affiliated with xAI. Always verify current pricing on the official xAI pricing page before making purchasing decisions. Token usage estimates in the scenarios above are approximations and actual usage will vary based on prompt complexity, model behavior, and other factors.