





















GPT-5.4 is OpenAI's current flagship model — the successor to GPT-5 that pushed the boundaries of reasoning, coding, and multimodal understanding even further. If you're building applications on top of the OpenAI API, understanding GPT-5.4's pricing structure is essential for managing costs and making smart architectural decisions.
This guide breaks down every aspect of GPT-5.4 pricing: the dual context tiers, automatic caching that slashes input costs by 90%, the Batch API for async workloads, data residency options, and how routing through Crazyrouter can save you 45% on every API call.
Before diving into numbers, let's talk about what you're paying for. GPT-5.4 represents a significant leap over GPT-5 in several key areas:
For production applications that demand top-tier intelligence, GPT-5.4 is the model to beat. The question isn't whether it's capable — it's how to use it cost-effectively.
GPT-5.4 uses a two-tier pricing model based on context length. This is important to understand because the prices differ significantly between the two tiers.
For requests that fit within the standard 270K token context window:
| Component | Price per MTok |
|---|---|
| Input tokens | $2.50 |
| Cached input tokens | $0.25 |
| Output tokens | $15.00 |
When your request exceeds 270K tokens, the long-context tier kicks in with higher prices:
| Component | Price per MTok |
|---|---|
| Input tokens | $5.00 |
| Cached input tokens | $0.50 |
| Output tokens | $22.50 |
The long-context tier costs 2x for input and 1.5x for output compared to short context. This pricing structure incentivizes you to keep requests under 270K tokens when possible.
For most applications — chatbots, code assistants, content generation, data extraction — you'll comfortably stay within the short-context tier. The long-context tier is designed for specialized use cases like analyzing entire codebases, processing lengthy legal documents, or working with large datasets in a single pass.
Pro tip: If you're regularly hitting the long-context tier, consider whether you can split your workload into smaller chunks. Processing two 200K-token requests is cheaper than one 400K-token request.
This is where GPT-5.4 pricing gets interesting — and where you can save the most money without changing a single line of code.
Unlike Anthropic's Claude, which requires you to manually set cache_control breakpoints in your prompts, OpenAI's caching is fully automatic. Here's how it works:
Let's say you have a system prompt of 5,000 tokens that you send with every request. Without caching, that's:
With automatic caching (after the first request):
That's a 90% reduction on the cached portion. Over thousands of requests, this adds up fast.
Caching is most effective when you have:
Caching applies to the long-context tier as well:
Same 90% discount. If you're working with large documents and making multiple queries against them, caching can dramatically reduce your costs even in the long-context tier.
| Feature | OpenAI (GPT-5.4) | Anthropic (Claude) |
|---|---|---|
| Activation | Automatic | Manual (cache_control) |
| Code changes needed | None | Yes |
| TTL management | Automatic | Developer-managed |
| Cache write cost | None | Additional charge |
| Discount on cached tokens | 90% off | 90% off |
OpenAI's approach is simpler — you get the savings without any implementation overhead. Anthropic's approach gives you more control but requires explicit cache management in your code.
If your workload doesn't need real-time responses, the Batch API is the single biggest cost lever available to you.
The Batch API gives you a flat 50% discount on all token prices:
| Component | Standard Price | Batch Price |
|---|---|---|
| Short input | $2.50/MTok | $1.25/MTok |
| Short cached input | $0.25/MTok | $0.125/MTok |
| Short output | $15.00/MTok | $7.50/MTok |
| Long input | $5.00/MTok | $2.50/MTok |
| Long cached input | $0.50/MTok | $0.25/MTok |
| Long output | $22.50/MTok | $11.25/MTok |
The Batch API is ideal for:
Combining the Batch API with caching can yield extraordinary savings. If your batch requests share common prefixes (like a system prompt), you get the 50% batch discount on top of the 90% caching discount on the cached portion.
For organizations with data sovereignty requirements, OpenAI offers data residency options that guarantee your data is processed and stored within specific geographic regions.
Cost: A 10% uplift on all standard prices.
| Component | Standard | Data Residency |
|---|---|---|
| Short input | $2.50/MTok | $2.75/MTok |
| Short output | $15.00/MTok | $16.50/MTok |
| Long input | $5.00/MTok | $5.50/MTok |
| Long output | $22.50/MTok | $24.75/MTok |
Data residency is typically required for:
For most developers and startups, standard processing is sufficient. Only opt into data residency if your compliance requirements demand it.
Here's where it gets really good. Crazyrouter offers GPT-5.4 at 55% of OpenAI's official pricing — that's a 45% discount on every single API call.
| Component | OpenAI Official | Crazyrouter (55%) | You Save |
|---|---|---|---|
| Short input | $2.50/MTok | $1.375/MTok | $1.125/MTok |
| Short cached input | $0.25/MTok | $0.1375/MTok | $0.1125/MTok |
| Short output | $15.00/MTok | $8.25/MTok | $6.75/MTok |
| Long input | $5.00/MTok | $2.75/MTok | $2.25/MTok |
| Long cached input | $0.50/MTok | $0.275/MTok | $0.225/MTok |
| Long output | $22.50/MTok | $12.375/MTok | $10.125/MTok |
Switching to Crazyrouter takes about 30 seconds. You just change the base URL — everything else stays the same.
Crazyrouter is an OpenAI-compatible API gateway that aggregates demand across thousands of developers. By routing traffic efficiently and negotiating volume pricing, Crazyrouter passes the savings directly to you. You get the same GPT-5.4 model, the same API compatibility, and the same response quality — just at a lower price.
Key benefits:
Let's put these numbers into context with three realistic usage scenarios.
A customer support chatbot handling 50,000 conversations per month.
Assumptions:
Monthly token usage:
| Provider | Input Cost | Cached Cost | Output Cost | Total/Month |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI Direct | $75.00 | $75.00 | $1,125.00 | $1,275.00 |
| Crazyrouter | $41.25 | $41.25 | $618.75 | $701.25 |
Savings with Crazyrouter: 573.75/month(573.75/month (6,885/year)
An engineering team running nightly code reviews on 500 pull requests.
Assumptions:
Monthly token usage (22 working days):
| Provider | Input Cost | Cached Cost | Output Cost | Total/Month |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI Batch | $110.00 | $4.13 | $123.75 | $237.88 |
| Crazyrouter + Batch | $60.50 | $2.27 | $68.06 | $130.83 |
Savings with Crazyrouter: 107.05/month(107.05/month (1,284.60/year)
A legal tech company analyzing 200 contracts per month, each requiring the long-context tier.
Assumptions:
Monthly token usage:
| Provider | Input Cost | Cached Cost | Output Cost | Total/Month |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI Direct | $300.00 | $122.50 | $67.50 | $490.00 |
| Crazyrouter | $165.00 | $67.38 | $37.13 | $269.50 |
Savings with Crazyrouter: 220.50/month(220.50/month (2,646/year)
How does GPT-5.4 stack up against other frontier models on price?
| GPT-5.4 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input | $2.50/MTok | $3.00/MTok |
| Output | $15.00/MTok | $15.00/MTok |
| Cached input | $0.25/MTok | $0.30/MTok |
| Caching method | Automatic | Manual (cache_control) |
| Max context | 270K+ (tiered) | 200K |
| Batch API | 50% off | 50% off |
Verdict: GPT-5.4 is slightly cheaper on input tokens and offers automatic caching, which is simpler to implement. Claude Sonnet 4.6 gives you more granular cache control but requires code changes. Output pricing is identical. For pure cost optimization, GPT-5.4 has a slight edge — especially if you value the zero-effort caching.
| GPT-5.4 | Gemini 3.1 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Input | $2.50/MTok | $1.25/MTok |
| Output | $15.00/MTok | $10.00/MTok |
| Cached input | $0.25/MTok | $0.3125/MTok |
| Max context | 270K+ (tiered) | 1M+ |
| Batch API | 50% off | N/A |
Verdict: Gemini 3.1 Pro is cheaper on base pricing and offers a massive context window. However, GPT-5.4 generally outperforms on complex reasoning tasks, coding benchmarks, and instruction following. The Batch API discount also gives GPT-5.4 an edge for async workloads. Choose based on your quality requirements — if Gemini 3.1 Pro meets your quality bar, it's the more economical choice. If you need peak performance, GPT-5.4 justifies the premium.
Worth noting: Crazyrouter offers discounted pricing across all major models, not just GPT-5.4. If you're using multiple models in your stack, routing everything through Crazyrouter simplifies billing and maximizes savings across the board.
Two context tiers matter: Keep requests under 270K tokens when possible. The long-context tier costs 1.5–2x more.
Caching is free money: OpenAI's automatic caching gives you a 90% discount on repeated prompt prefixes with zero code changes. Design your prompts with consistent prefixes to maximize cache hits.
Batch API for async work: If you don't need real-time responses, the Batch API cuts all prices in half. Combine with caching for maximum savings.
Data residency only if required: The 10% uplift is worth it for compliance, but skip it if you don't need it.
Crazyrouter saves 45%: Same model, same API, same quality — just change the base URL and save on every call.
Stack your discounts: Caching + Batch API + Crazyrouter can reduce your effective cost by 70–80% compared to standard OpenAI pricing.
Ready to cut your GPT-5.4 costs by 45%? Getting started with Crazyrouter takes less than a minute:
https://crazyrouter.com/v1.Crazyrouter supports GPT-5.4 and 200+ other models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and more — all through a single, unified API. Pay-as-you-go pricing, no minimums, no commitments.
👉 Get your Crazyrouter API key →
Last updated: April 27, 2026
Disclaimer: Pricing information is based on publicly available data from OpenAI as of the publication date. Prices are subject to change. Crazyrouter pricing is based on current rates and may be adjusted. Always verify current pricing on the respective provider's website before making purchasing decisions. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理,仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。