日本語の結論：Opus 4.7 は合格率、Opus 4.8 は平均レイテンシ、Opus 4.6 は安定した既存用途に向いています。
本篇/この記事/이 글/Bài viết này 基于 https://cn.crazyrouter.com/v1 的真实调用结果，不是厂商宣传复述。测试模型：claude-opus-4-6、claude-opus-4-7、claude-opus-4-8。
| Model | Score | Avg latency | Total tokens | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
claude-opus-4-6 | 4/6 | 5.2s | 2847 | stable SQL, JSON, API review, Chinese support replies |
claude-opus-4-7 | 5/6 | 7.46s | 3297 | best overall pass rate, long-context extraction, structured output |
claude-opus-4-8 | 4/6 | 4.59s | 2838 | fastest average latency, concise JSON/API review, low token use |
| Test | Opus 4.6 | Opus 4.7 | Opus 4.8 | What it checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| arithmetic revenue | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | business arithmetic and step-by-step numeric reasoning |
| postgres sql | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Postgres query construction for paid users and token usage |
| long context extraction | ⚠️ | ✅ | ⚠️ | finding exact operational facts in a long noisy log |
| strict json no fence | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | JSON-only schema following without markdown fences |
| api client review | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | developer code review quality for an API client |
| chinese support reply | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Chinese customer-support answer with correct cn.crazyrouter.com/v1 guidance |
claude-opus-4-7: best default for agent/log extraction workflows in this run.claude-opus-4-8: best latency profile in this run.claude-opus-4-6: still useful when prompts are already validated.人看的链接加 UTM，代码里的 API base URL 不加 UTM。访问：Crazyrouter
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理，仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。