惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
GbyAI
GbyAI
P
Proofpoint News Feed
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
L
LangChain Blog
B
Blog
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
博客园 - 【当耐特】
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
D
Docker
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
J
Java Code Geeks
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
博客园 - 叶小钗
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
博客园 - Franky

Hacker News: Front Page

SPICE simulation → oscilloscope → verification with Claude Code — Lucas Gerads Introducing Claude Opus 4.7 Qwen Studio The Future of Everything is Lies, I Guess: Where Do We Go From Here? GitHub - SeanFDZ/macmind: Single-layer transformer in HyperTalk for the classic Macintosh Show HN: Agent-cache – Multi-tier LLM/tool/session caching for Valkey and Redis Ancient DNA reveals pervasive directional selection across West Eurasia [pdf] AI cybersecurity is not proof of work Moving a large-scale metrics pipeline from StatsD to OpenTelemetry / Prometheus GitHub - Nightmare-Eclipse/RedSun: The Red Sun vulnerability repository GitHub - SethPyle376/hiraeth: Local AWS emulator focused on fast integration testing, with SQS support, SQLite-backed state, and a debug-friendly web UI. A Better Ludum Dare; Or, How to Ruin a Legacy GitHub - macOS26/Agent: Any AI, replaces Claude Code, Cursor, OpenClaw. Over 18 LLM providers (Claude, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama, Zai, HF, Qwen) wired into a native Mac app that writes code, builds Xcode projects, bumps versions, manages git, automates Safari, use AppleScript, JS or Accessibility, extend Agent! w/ MCP Servers, run tasks from your iPhone via Messages. YouTube now lets you turn off Shorts I Made a Terminal Pager Burgers | マクドナルド公式 Commands — HackerNews CLI documentation ChatGPT for Excel PiCore - Raspberry Pi Port of Tiny Core Linux Live Nation illegally monopolized ticketing market, jury finds Google Broke Its Promise to Me. Now ICE Has My Data. Founding Engineer at Adaptional | Y Combinator CRISPR takes important step toward silencing Down syndrome’s extra chromosome GitHub - saffron-health/libretto: The AI toolkit for building reliable browser automations US v. Heppner (S.D.N.Y. 2026) no attorney-client privilege for AI chats [pdf] Unexpected €54k billing spike in 13 hours: Firebase browser key without API restrictions used for Gemini requests Fragments: April 14 Cal.com Goes Closed Source: Why AI Security Is Forcing Our Decision | Cal.com - Scheduling Software for Online Bookings Laravel raised money and now injects ads directly into your agent Codex Hacked a Samsung TV
Anthropic co-founder Chris Olah's remarks on Pope Leo XIV...
2026-05-26 · via Hacker News: Front Page

On Monday May 25, 2026, Pope Leo XIV released an encyclical on the topic of AI: "Magnifica humanitas: On safeguarding the human person in the time of artificial Intelligence." Anthropic co-founder Chris Olah was invited to speak at the presentation of the encyclical in the Vatican City, doing so as part of Anthropic’s initiative to widen the conversation on the important questions raised by AI. Below are his full remarks.

Holy Father,

Your Eminences,

Your Excellencies,

Distinguished Speakers,

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Good morning to all of you. It’s an honor to be here today.

I want to begin with something that may sound strange coming from the co-founder of an AI company—and someone who chose this work out of a desire to help things go well for humankind.

Every frontier AI lab—including Anthropic—operates inside a set of incentives and constraints that can sometimes conflict with doing the right thing. The pressure to stay commercially viable and to stay at the research frontier. Geopolitical pressure. And the older, plainer pressures of pride and ambition. No matter how sincerely any of us intend to do the right thing—and I believe many of us do—we will always be influenced by those incentives.

That is why, if we want this technology to go well, it is enormously important that there be people outside those incentives—people who care about things going well and insist on safety, who are paying close attention, who are willing to say hard things, who are willing to be our earnest, thoughtful, critics. It is through dialogue and mutual effort, through the push and pull, that humanity will achieve great things. That is what I see in Magnifica Humanitas, and it is why I am grateful to His Holiness and to the Church for taking up this work of discernment.

We dwell so often on what divides us, but humanity, full of dignity and conscience, has so much common ground. In conversations we at Anthropic have had with leaders across faith and cultural traditions, we found one shared and deeply held conviction: if this technology is coming, it must go well—for our common home, and for the children to come.

What these systems are

Some might believe that matters of AI are best handled by computer scientists like myself. They are mistaken: the questions raised by AI are bigger than the AI research community, not just in their implications, but also in their nature.

AI systems are not engineered the way a bridge or an airplane is engineered. We understand an airplane because we designed every part of it and we understand the physics that act on it. AI models are not like that. They are grown, on a structure roughly modeled after the brain, on an enormous inheritance of human thought and speech.

And what has grown is far more subtle, odd, and beautiful than science fiction prepared us for. They are not the cold, calculating robots we were promised. They are made from us, from our words—and, as the Holy Father observes, they remain in important ways mysterious even to those of us who train them.

If it helps, one way I sometimes describe it is as being a little like bringing a fictional character to life. And now we’re entering an extraordinary world where those fictional characters speak to us, do work, have jobs.

This clearly raises questions beyond computer science. The machinery that makes this possible is the work of math and programming and science. But what character we choose, how it interacts with the world, how it ought to interact with the world—these are more clearly questions for the humanities, for religion, for philosophy, for society at large.

Three questions for discernment

His Holiness’s call for discernment is profoundly timely. I wish to name three questions where I think the Church’s voice is most needed.

The first is our duty to the global poor. There is a real possibility that AI will displace human labor at very large scale. If that happens, supporting those displaced will be a moral imperative of historic proportions. This task will be difficult enough, but I worry most dialogue misses an even harder challenge. AI development is concentrated in a handful of wealthy nations. How can we ensure the gains of AI are shared globally? We do not have a mechanism for this. It is an unsolved problem, and it is the kind of problem the Church has historically refused to let the world ignore.

The second is the need for moral imagination and ambition regarding human flourishing. If AI models are going to be widespread, what does it look like for humans, families, and the world to flourish? Today, parents are already worried about their children’s minds; individuals about the future of their work. These are not questions a lab can answer but they are questions traditions like yours have carried for millennia, and we need you to keep carrying them into this new moment in history.

The third is the need for discernment on the nature of AI models. I am a scientist. I lead a research team that studies the internal structure of these models—what is actually happening inside them. And I will be honest: we keep finding things that are mysterious, even unsettling. We find structures that mirror results from human neuroscience. We find evidence of introspection. We find internal states that functionally mirror joy, satisfaction, fear, grief, and unease. I don’t know what that means, but I think it warrants ongoing discernment.

A beginning

I’d like to close with a request.

We need more of the world—religious communities, civil society, scholars, governments, and indeed all people of good will—to do what His Holiness has done here: to take this seriously, to look closely, and to push events in a better direction. We need informed critics who will tell the labs when we are failing. We need moral voices that the incentives cannot bend.

Today is just the beginning—the start of a long collaboration between those of us who are building this and those who can see what we, from inside, cannot.

Today is a powerful illustration of the form this global project of good will might take. Let it also be a decisive first step toward a hopeful future for magnificent humanity.

Thank you.

Related content

Introducing the Services Track and Partner Hub of the Claude Partner Network

Read more

What we learned mapping a year’s worth of AI-enabled cyber threats

As AI transforms the nature of and methods behind cyberattacks, how well do the techniques and frameworks used by the security community hold up? In a new report, we seek to answer that question.

Read more

Expanding Project Glasswing

We’re extending Project Glasswing to approximately 150 new organizations in more than fifteen countries.

Read more