惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

IT之家
IT之家
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
GbyAI
GbyAI
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
美团技术团队
Y
Y Combinator Blog
博客园 - 叶小钗
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
罗磊的独立博客
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
博客园 - Franky
V
Visual Studio Blog
I
InfoQ
V
V2EX
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
腾讯CDC
博客园 - 司徒正美
L
LangChain Blog

Hacker News: Front Page

SPICE simulation → oscilloscope → verification with Claude Code — Lucas Gerads Introducing Claude Opus 4.7 Qwen Studio The Future of Everything is Lies, I Guess: Where Do We Go From Here? GitHub - SeanFDZ/macmind: Single-layer transformer in HyperTalk for the classic Macintosh Show HN: Agent-cache – Multi-tier LLM/tool/session caching for Valkey and Redis Ancient DNA reveals pervasive directional selection across West Eurasia [pdf] AI cybersecurity is not proof of work Moving a large-scale metrics pipeline from StatsD to OpenTelemetry / Prometheus GitHub - Nightmare-Eclipse/RedSun: The Red Sun vulnerability repository GitHub - SethPyle376/hiraeth: Local AWS emulator focused on fast integration testing, with SQS support, SQLite-backed state, and a debug-friendly web UI. A Better Ludum Dare; Or, How to Ruin a Legacy GitHub - macOS26/Agent: Any AI, replaces Claude Code, Cursor, OpenClaw. Over 18 LLM providers (Claude, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama, Zai, HF, Qwen) wired into a native Mac app that writes code, builds Xcode projects, bumps versions, manages git, automates Safari, use AppleScript, JS or Accessibility, extend Agent! w/ MCP Servers, run tasks from your iPhone via Messages. YouTube now lets you turn off Shorts I Made a Terminal Pager Burgers | マクドナルド公式 Commands — HackerNews CLI documentation ChatGPT for Excel PiCore - Raspberry Pi Port of Tiny Core Linux Live Nation illegally monopolized ticketing market, jury finds Google Broke Its Promise to Me. Now ICE Has My Data. Founding Engineer at Adaptional | Y Combinator CRISPR takes important step toward silencing Down syndrome’s extra chromosome GitHub - saffron-health/libretto: The AI toolkit for building reliable browser automations US v. Heppner (S.D.N.Y. 2026) no attorney-client privilege for AI chats [pdf] Unexpected €54k billing spike in 13 hours: Firebase browser key without API restrictions used for Gemini requests Fragments: April 14 Cal.com Goes Closed Source: Why AI Security Is Forcing Our Decision | Cal.com - Scheduling Software for Online Bookings Laravel raised money and now injects ads directly into your agent Codex Hacked a Samsung TV
argusred — security scan and pen test · ArgusRed
2026-06-09 · via Hacker News: Front Page

Audit your code. Or attack it.

Two modes in one CLI. Security Scan reads the code. Pen Test attempts the exploits against systems you authorise.

$ brew install CosineAI/argusred/argusred && argusred

$ curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CosineAI/argusred-dist/main/install.sh | sh

PS> Windows support is coming soon.

Pick modules, set the agent’s permissions, optionally turn on exploit verification, run. Output is a markdown report — location, severity, cause, and fix direction for every finding it could ground in your code.

Free install. The first run opens a quick Cosine sign-up — the same login that runs Cosine’s coding agent — and new accounts start with 2M free tokens.

$ cd path/to/your/repo

$ argusred

→ first run opens a Cosine sign-up — you start with 2M free tokens

Before the scan runs.

argusred v2.0.19 · Security Scan · setup

Scan Scope — 5 of 8 active

[×]Dependency Vulnerability Analysis

[×]Secret & Credential Detection

[×]SQL Injection / XSS Vectors

[ ]Authentication & Session Flows

[×]Input Validation & Sanitisation

[ ]CORS & CSP Misconfigurations

[ ]Cryptographic Weakness Scan

[×]File Permission & Access Controls

Exploit Verification

Optionally verify reported findings by attempting safe exploit reproduction after the initial report.

Exploit Verification (•) Disabled ( ) Docker ( ) Live FS

Agent Permissions

Terminal Access ( ) Enabled (•) Disabled ( ) Sandboxed

Network Requests ( ) Enabled (•) Disabled ( ) Sandboxed

File Write ( ) Enabled ( ) Disabled (•) Sandboxed

scroll 0% · a start · tab next · shift+tab prev · q quit

Verify the findings.

Don’t just report a vulnerability — prove it. Turn on Exploit Verification and the agent attempts a safe reproduction of each finding after the initial report, so what lands in front of you is confirmed, not theoretical.

  • Docker — reproduction runs inside an ephemeral, isolated container spun up from your repo. Nothing touches your host; the container is torn down when it finishes.
  • Live FS — reproduction runs against your actual checkout, for findings that only manifest in a real environment. Your code stays read-only — the Go harness still blocks writes.
  • Disabled (default) — report only, no reproduction attempts.

See the output.

Read a sample report

.argusred/scan-2026-06-05.md

# Bank of Anthos — Security Audit Report

29,846 LOC / 391 files · 6 of 8 modules


## 1. Executive Summary

Overall risk rating: CRITICAL

Multiple critical and high-severity vulnerabilities:

  • Forgeable tokens across every ledger servicebalancereader, transactionhistory, and ledgerwriter verify JWTs against a single shared RSA public key with no issuer or audience claim binding. Combined with the hardcoded private key in the repo (see below), a token signed off-cluster passes verification at every service and authorises any account; per-service trust collapses to “do you have the repo.”
  • Disabled JWT signature verification in the frontend authentication helper
  • Integer overflow in financial transaction validation allowing balance bypass
  • SSRF and open redirect in the OAuth consent flow
  • Credentials transmitted in URL query strings on the login flow
  • Hardcoded secrets in version control, including an RSA private key used to sign JWTs

[ trimmed — full report includes per-module findings ]

Watch a scan run · 1m 26s

Won’t do.

  • Won’t modify your code. Read-only is enforced by the Go harness below the model — every tool call is intercepted before execution; mutating ones (file writes, command execution) are deterministically blocked, regardless of what the model wants.
  • No fuzzing, no DAST, no live exploitation. Active testing lives in Pen Test mode.
  • Won’t include findings it can’t ground in your code. No vibes-based vulnerabilities.

Quick answers.

How long does a scan take?

Two data points: a 6-module scan of Bank of Anthos (~30k LOC) finished in ~10 minutes; a full scan of Symfony (~1.5M LOC) took ~40 minutes. Time scales sub-linearly with codebase size because modules run as a parallel swarm; the TUI shows a live estimate before you start.

What’s the output file?

A single markdown at .argusred/scan-<date>.md with executive summary, per-module findings, location, severity, cause, and fix direction. The file stays on your machine.

What does it cost?

Install is free, and your first run drops 2M free tokens in a new Cosine account — enough to try it on a real repo. After that, scans run on Cosine usage under the same login that runs Cosine’s coding agent. One account, both products.

Same CLI, second tab. The swarm goes offensive against systems you authorise — not just reading the code, attempting the exploits. Gated because the security implications are real; access is via booking, scope and authorisation written down before anything runs.

Before the pen test runs.

argusred vnightly-906 · Pen Test · setup

Targets

Only add systems you are authorised to test. Press a to add a host or URL.

No targets added yet

Effort

Passive Aggressive

Recon Light ▲ Moderate Deep Aggressive

Active probing with crafted payloads. May trigger WAF rules or rate limits. No destructive actions. Suitable for staging environments.

[×]Port & service fingerprinting

[×]Header & TLS analysis

[×]Directory & endpoint enumeration

[×]Payload injection (SQLi, XSS, SSTI)

[ ]Brute-force credential spraying— Deep

[ ]Exploit chain construction— Aggressive

[ ]Denial-of-service resilience testing— Aggressive

Agent Permissions

Terminal Access (•) Enabled ( ) Disabled ( ) Sandboxed

Network Requests (•) Enabled ( ) Disabled ( ) Sandboxed

File Write ( ) Enabled ( ) Disabled (•) Sandboxed

Estimate

Targets0 hosts EffortModerate (4 technique classes) Est. Time~1 min Agent Cycles~2–3 iterations

▶ Start Pentest Cancel

s start · tab next · shift+tab prev · 1/2 mode · a add target · q quit

See the output.

Read a sample engagement summary

.argusred/pentest-2026-06-08.md

# api.your-app.com — Pen Test Engagement

booking 2A4F · 2026-06-08 · 4h22m · Moderate effort


## Executive Summary

Status: 2 critical, 1 high, 3 medium — all reproducible.

Scope: 2 hosts, 47 endpoints. Out-of-scope items deferred and flagged for next engagement.


## Confirmed Exploits

1. JWT signature bypass (CRITICAL · CVSS 8.6)
POST /v1/sessions/refresh — forged token with disabled signature verification, returned 200 OK with admin scope. Reproduction script included.

2. SSRF via OAuth consent redirect (HIGH · CVSS 7.4)
Open redirect on /oauth/authorize resolved arbitrary internal URLs. Reproduction included.

[ trimmed — full summary includes evidence and remediation per finding ]

Won’t do.

  • Won’t run without signed authorisation. Booking is the legal step — targets, time-box, and what’s allowed are written down before anything runs.
  • Won’t expand scope. Authorised targets only, even if interesting ones show up next door.
  • Won’t keep going past the booked time-box. Effort ramps stop where the booking says they stop.
  • Doesn’t escalate. If a finding needs deeper access than booked, it stops and notes it in the engagement summary.

Quick answers.

How is this different from the scan?

The scan reads code and infers from what’s there. The pen test actually attempts the exploits against running systems you authorise — different binary mode, different agent behaviour, different deliverable (engagement summary, not audit report).

How does scoping work?

You provide hosts/endpoints plus written consent at booking. The agent’s network is scoped to that list — it can’t reach anything else, even if a finding suggests it should.

What does it cost?

Decided per engagement at booking. Scope and effort level determine the time-box; the time-box determines the price.

It’s a closed binary, built on Cosine’s own model.

argusred runs on a model Cosine post-trained for offensive security, not an off-the-shelf API behind a prompt wrapper. We trained it because off-the-shelf models refuse the work this product does — a security scanner that won’t read the parts of your code worth attacking isn’t a security scanner.

Safety isn’t a layer of refusals you can talk the model out of. It’s a Go harness sitting below the model that intercepts every tool call before execution. In Security Scan mode, the harness deterministically blocks mutating tools (file writes, command execution) regardless of what the model wants — read-only is a guard, not a flag. In Pen Test mode, the same harness limits network egress to the targets you authorised at booking.

The binary you install with brew or curl is the same one we run internally. It is not open source. It runs locally on your machine. You can run argusred behind a firewall and tcpdump what it does before trusting it on real code.