@xiaozuo 我想的是，既然即使用了区块链，发行权还是在“ Libra Association ”手上，而且 Libra 的发行都需要“ Libra Association ”进行审查，那既然有着一层审查了，已经能证明会按照规则来发行了。

而且，即使用了区块链，如果审查这一层出了问题，造假超发也完全可以。这个东西还是要建立在大家对“ Libra Association ”的信任之上。

Libra Association 是一个委员会 协调组织 跟你所想表达的中央组织还是有很大差异的。

@md5 锚定一揽子货币

当然如果 Libra 如果成功了 各大科技公司必然会各种抱团发币

至少记账那部分是依赖区块链的

话说当下，要开发一个记账系统，除了区块链还有啥选择？

“ The Libra Association also serves as the entity through which the Libra Reserve is managed, and hence the stability and growth of the Libra economy are achieved. The association is the only party able to create (mint) and destroy (burn) Libra. Coins are only minted when authorized resellers have purchased those coins from the association with fiat assets to fully back the new coins. Coins are only burned when the authorized resellers sell Libra coin to the association in exchange for the underlying assets. Since authorized resellers will always be able to sell Libra coins to the reserve at a price equal to the value of the basket, the Libra Reserve acts as a “ buyer of last resort.” These activities of the association are governed and constrained by a Reserve Management Policy that can only be changed by a supermajority of the association members.”

@jfdnet 原话。我还是不明白。这个委员会即使是个联盟，它也是一种形式的中央组织。

@Dillion 与其说销毁 不如说是回购。

你可以去查一查 币安销毁原生代币 BNB 是怎么一回事情。白皮书里面用了“销毁”这个词 也是只能书面直译 可能理解上来就完全不是那个意思了。
并且与币安这种不断发行和销毁的 Tether 等抵押稳定币的交易所不同，Libra 协会根据其储备的需求变化做出响应，不大可能大规模销毁代币。