惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

爱范儿
爱范儿
H
Help Net Security
Jina AI
Jina AI
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
博客园 - 叶小钗
Y
Y Combinator Blog
罗磊的独立博客
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
C
Check Point Blog
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
IT之家
IT之家
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
美团技术团队
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
雷峰网
雷峰网
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
V
Visual Studio Blog
B
Blog

Recent Commits to openclaw:main

test: merge chat side-result checks · openclaw/openclaw@ddd2c2a test: merge cron history checks · openclaw/openclaw@f7eb746 test: merge responsive navigation shell checks · openclaw/openclaw@c2e4b47 docs(changelog): add codex oauth fixes · openclaw/openclaw@628e6cd test: merge navigation routing cases · openclaw/openclaw@5d8cecb Tests: mock channel registry bundled fallback · openclaw/openclaw@2b08233 Secrets: avoid broad web search discovery for single plugin config · openclaw/openclaw@a464f59 test: merge config view browser checks · openclaw/openclaw@20cf511 fix(status): align oauth health with runtime · openclaw/openclaw@eed7116 test: merge chat context notice checks · openclaw/openclaw@5c2f4af feat: add macOS screen snapshots for monitor preview (#67954) thanks … · openclaw/openclaw@f377db1 fix: report shared auth scopes in hello-ok (#67810) thanks @BunsDev · openclaw/openclaw@0b6c39b Auto-reply: avoid eager bundled route fallback · openclaw/openclaw@3ea1bf4 Tests: narrow session binding contract setup · openclaw/openclaw@54e4e16 fix(macOS): enable undo/redo in webchat composer text input (#34962) · openclaw/openclaw@00951dc Tests: speed up channel setup promotion · openclaw/openclaw@82b529a Docs: refresh agent instructions · openclaw/openclaw@5775fe2 fix(auth): serialize OAuth refresh across agents to fix #26322 (#67876) · openclaw/openclaw@8e79080 test: allow ollama public surface boundary test · openclaw/openclaw@7d4f1a6 Docs: add test performance guardrails · openclaw/openclaw@89706d3 Tests: restore context-engine usage proof · openclaw/openclaw@e4c4f95 Tests: slim context engine runtime coverage · openclaw/openclaw@74c198f ci: retry failed custom checkouts · openclaw/openclaw@0ee5baf test: trim duplicate provider auth onboarding cases · openclaw/openclaw@1ffc02e matrix: fix sessions_spawn --thread subagent session spawning (#67643) · openclaw/openclaw@1ce2596 test: reduce auth choice fixture churn · openclaw/openclaw@857b9cd test: mock health status config boundaries · openclaw/openclaw@9d5ab4a test: mock onboard config io boundary · openclaw/openclaw@299694d test: mock legacy state plugin boundaries · openclaw/openclaw@2713089 test: mock channel install boundaries · openclaw/openclaw@b945248
fix: dedupe replayed exec.finished node events (#67281) ·...
2026-04-16 · via Recent Commits to openclaw:main

@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@

1+

# Async Exec Duplicate Completion Investigation

2+3+

## Scope

4+5+

- Session: `agent:main:telegram:group:-1003774691294:topic:1`

6+

- Symptom: the same async exec completion for session/run `keen-nexus` was recorded twice in LCM as user turns.

7+

- Goal: identify whether this is most likely duplicate session injection or plain outbound delivery retry.

8+9+

## Conclusion

10+11+

Most likely this is **duplicate session injection**, not a pure outbound delivery retry.

12+13+

The strongest gateway-side gap is in the **node exec completion path**:

14+15+

1. A node-side exec finish emits `exec.finished` with the full `runId`.

16+

2. Gateway `server-node-events` converts that into a system event and requests a heartbeat.

17+

3. The heartbeat run injects the drained system event block into the agent prompt.

18+

4. The embedded runner persists that prompt as a new user turn in the session transcript.

19+20+

If the same `exec.finished` reaches the gateway twice for the same `runId` for any reason (replay, reconnect duplicate, upstream resend, duplicated producer), OpenClaw currently has **no idempotency check keyed by `runId`/`contextKey`** on this path. The second copy will become a second user message with the same content.

21+22+

## Exact Code Path

23+24+

### 1. Producer: node exec completion event

25+26+

- `src/node-host/invoke.ts:340-360`

27+

- `sendExecFinishedEvent(...)` emits `node.event` with event `exec.finished`.

28+

- Payload includes `sessionKey` and full `runId`.

29+30+

### 2. Gateway event ingestion

31+32+

- `src/gateway/server-node-events.ts:574-640`

33+

- Handles `exec.finished`.

34+

- Builds text:

35+

- `Exec finished (node=..., id=<runId>, code ...)`

36+

- Enqueues it via:

37+

- `enqueueSystemEvent(text, { sessionKey, contextKey: runId ? \`exec:${runId}\` : "exec", trusted: false })`

38+

- Immediately requests a wake:

39+

- `requestHeartbeatNow(scopedHeartbeatWakeOptions(sessionKey, { reason: "exec-event" }))`

40+41+

### 3. System event dedupe weakness

42+43+

- `src/infra/system-events.ts:90-115`

44+

- `enqueueSystemEvent(...)` only suppresses **consecutive duplicate text**:

45+

- `if (entry.lastText === cleaned) return false`

46+

- It stores `contextKey`, but does **not** use `contextKey` for idempotency.

47+

- After drain, duplicate suppression resets.

48+49+

This means a replayed `exec.finished` with the same `runId` can be accepted again later, even though the code already had a stable idempotency candidate (`exec:<runId>`).

50+51+

### 4. Wake handling is not the primary duplicator

52+53+

- `src/infra/heartbeat-wake.ts:79-117`

54+

- Wakes are coalesced by `(agentId, sessionKey)`.

55+

- Duplicate wake requests for the same target collapse to one pending wake entry.

56+57+

This makes **duplicate wake handling alone** a weaker explanation than duplicate event ingestion.

58+59+

### 5. Heartbeat consumes the event and turns it into prompt input

60+61+

- `src/infra/heartbeat-runner.ts:535-574`

62+

- Preflight peeks pending system events and classifies exec-event runs.

63+

- `src/auto-reply/reply/session-system-events.ts:86-90`

64+

- `drainFormattedSystemEvents(...)` drains the queue for the session.

65+

- `src/auto-reply/reply/get-reply-run.ts:400-427`

66+

- The drained system event block is prepended into the agent prompt body.

67+68+

### 6. Transcript injection point

69+70+

- `src/agents/pi-embedded-runner/run/attempt.ts:2000-2017`

71+

- `activeSession.prompt(effectivePrompt)` submits the full prompt to the embedded PI session.

72+

- That is the point where the completion-derived prompt becomes a persisted user turn.

73+74+

So once the same system event is rebuilt into the prompt twice, duplicate LCM user messages are expected.

75+76+

## Why plain outbound delivery retry is less likely

77+78+

There is a real outbound failure path in the heartbeat runner:

79+80+

- `src/infra/heartbeat-runner.ts:1194-1242`

81+

- The reply is generated first.

82+

- Outbound delivery happens later via `deliverOutboundPayloads(...)`.

83+

- Failure there returns `{ status: "failed" }`.

84+85+

However, for the same system event queue entry, this alone is **not sufficient** to explain the duplicate user turns:

86+87+

- `src/auto-reply/reply/session-system-events.ts:86-90`

88+

- The system event queue is already drained before outbound delivery.

89+90+

So a channel send retry by itself would not recreate the exact same queued event. It could explain missing/failed external delivery, but not by itself a second identical session user message.

91+92+

## Secondary, lower-confidence possibility

93+94+

There is a full-run retry loop in the agent runner:

95+96+

- `src/auto-reply/reply/agent-runner-execution.ts:741-1473`

97+

- Certain transient failures can retry the whole run and resubmit the same `commandBody`.

98+99+

That can duplicate a persisted user prompt **within the same reply execution** if the prompt was already appended before the retry condition triggered.

100+101+

I rank this lower than duplicate `exec.finished` ingestion because:

102+103+

- the observed gap was around 51 seconds, which looks more like a second wake/turn than an in-process retry;

104+

- the report already mentions repeated message send failures, which points more toward a separate later turn than an immediate model/runtime retry.

105+106+

## Root Cause Hypothesis

107+108+

Highest-confidence hypothesis:

109+110+

- The `keen-nexus` completion came through the **node exec event path**.

111+

- The same `exec.finished` was delivered to `server-node-events` twice.

112+

- Gateway accepted both because `enqueueSystemEvent(...)` does not dedupe by `contextKey` / `runId`.

113+

- Each accepted event triggered a heartbeat and was injected as a user turn into the PI transcript.

114+115+

## Proposed Tiny Surgical Fix

116+117+

If a fix is wanted, the smallest high-value change is:

118+119+

- make exec/system-event idempotency honor `contextKey` for a short horizon, at least for exact `(sessionKey, contextKey, text)` repeats;

120+

- or add a dedicated dedupe in `server-node-events` for `exec.finished` keyed by `(sessionKey, runId, event kind)`.

121+122+

That would directly block replayed `exec.finished` duplicates before they become session turns.