惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
博客园_首页
IT之家
IT之家
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
Vercel News
Vercel News
美团技术团队
D
Docker
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
The Cloudflare Blog
Y
Y Combinator Blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
G
Google Developers Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
月光博客
月光博客
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
GbyAI
GbyAI
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
A
About on SuperTechFans

Recent Commits to openclaw:main

test: merge chat side-result checks · openclaw/openclaw@ddd2c2a test: merge cron history checks · openclaw/openclaw@f7eb746 test: merge responsive navigation shell checks · openclaw/openclaw@c2e4b47 docs(changelog): add codex oauth fixes · openclaw/openclaw@628e6cd test: merge navigation routing cases · openclaw/openclaw@5d8cecb Tests: mock channel registry bundled fallback · openclaw/openclaw@2b08233 Secrets: avoid broad web search discovery for single plugin config · openclaw/openclaw@a464f59 test: merge config view browser checks · openclaw/openclaw@20cf511 fix(status): align oauth health with runtime · openclaw/openclaw@eed7116 feat: add macOS screen snapshots for monitor preview (#67954) thanks … · openclaw/openclaw@f377db1 fix: report shared auth scopes in hello-ok (#67810) thanks @BunsDev · openclaw/openclaw@0b6c39b Auto-reply: avoid eager bundled route fallback · openclaw/openclaw@3ea1bf4 Tests: narrow session binding contract setup · openclaw/openclaw@54e4e16 fix(macOS): enable undo/redo in webchat composer text input (#34962) · openclaw/openclaw@00951dc Tests: speed up channel setup promotion · openclaw/openclaw@82b529a Docs: refresh agent instructions · openclaw/openclaw@5775fe2 fix(auth): serialize OAuth refresh across agents to fix #26322 (#67876) · openclaw/openclaw@8e79080 test: allow ollama public surface boundary test · openclaw/openclaw@7d4f1a6 Docs: add test performance guardrails · openclaw/openclaw@89706d3 Tests: restore context-engine usage proof · openclaw/openclaw@e4c4f95 Tests: slim context engine runtime coverage · openclaw/openclaw@74c198f ci: retry failed custom checkouts · openclaw/openclaw@0ee5baf test: trim duplicate provider auth onboarding cases · openclaw/openclaw@1ffc02e matrix: fix sessions_spawn --thread subagent session spawning (#67643) · openclaw/openclaw@1ce2596 test: reduce auth choice fixture churn · openclaw/openclaw@857b9cd test: mock health status config boundaries · openclaw/openclaw@9d5ab4a test: mock onboard config io boundary · openclaw/openclaw@299694d test: mock legacy state plugin boundaries · openclaw/openclaw@2713089 test: mock channel install boundaries · openclaw/openclaw@b945248 test: mock doctor preview channel boundaries · openclaw/openclaw@b1a3ad4
fix(exec): honor node approval floors before auto-review ...
joshavant · 2026-05-29 · via Recent Commits to openclaw:main

@@ -38,6 +38,18 @@ const evaluateShellAllowlistMock = vi.hoisted(() =>

3838

segmentAllowlistEntries: [],

3939

})),

4040

);

41+

const resolveExecApprovalsFromFileMock = vi.hoisted(() =>

42+

vi.fn(() => ({

43+

allowlist: [],

44+

file: { version: 1, agents: {} },

45+

agent: {

46+

security: "full",

47+

ask: "off",

48+

askFallback: "deny",

49+

autoAllowSkills: false,

50+

},

51+

})),

52+

);

4153

const requiresExecApprovalMock = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(() => true));

4254

const resolveExecHostApprovalContextMock = vi.hoisted(() =>

4355

vi.fn(() => ({

@@ -93,10 +105,7 @@ vi.mock("../infra/exec-approvals.js", () => ({

93105

hasDurableExecApproval: vi.fn(() => false),

94106

requiresExecApproval: requiresExecApprovalMock,

95107

resolveExecApprovalAllowedDecisions: vi.fn(() => ["allow-once", "allow-always", "deny"]),

96-

resolveExecApprovalsFromFile: vi.fn(() => ({

97-

allowlist: [],

98-

file: { version: 1, agents: {} },

99-

})),

108+

resolveExecApprovalsFromFile: resolveExecApprovalsFromFileMock,

100109

}));

101110102111

vi.mock("../infra/command-analysis/inline-eval.js", () => ({

@@ -275,6 +284,17 @@ describe("executeNodeHostCommand", () => {

275284

segments: [{ resolution: null, argv: ["bun", "./script.ts"] }],

276285

segmentAllowlistEntries: [],

277286

});

287+

resolveExecApprovalsFromFileMock.mockReset();

288+

resolveExecApprovalsFromFileMock.mockReturnValue({

289+

allowlist: [],

290+

file: { version: 1, agents: {} },

291+

agent: {

292+

security: "full",

293+

ask: "off",

294+

askFallback: "deny",

295+

autoAllowSkills: false,

296+

},

297+

});

278298

requiresExecApprovalMock.mockReset();

279299

requiresExecApprovalMock.mockReturnValue(true);

280300

resolveExecHostApprovalContextMock.mockReset();

@@ -460,6 +480,94 @@ describe("executeNodeHostCommand", () => {

460480

expect(warnings.join("\n")).toContain("needs a person");

461481

});

462482483+

it.each([

484+

{

485+

name: "ask always",

486+

nodeSecurity: "full",

487+

nodeAsk: "always",

488+

},

489+

{

490+

name: "deny security",

491+

nodeSecurity: "deny",

492+

nodeAsk: "off",

493+

},

494+

] as const)(

495+

"requests human approval when node policy has $name floor",

496+

async ({ nodeSecurity, nodeAsk }) => {

497+

const autoReviewer = vi.fn<ExecAutoReviewer>(async () => ({

498+

decision: "allow-once",

499+

risk: "low",

500+

rationale: "test reviewer would allow it",

501+

}));

502+

resolveExecHostApprovalContextMock.mockReturnValue({

503+

approvals: { allowlist: [], file: { version: 1, agents: {} } },

504+

hostSecurity: "allowlist",

505+

hostAsk: "on-miss",

506+

askFallback: "deny",

507+

});

508+

resolveExecApprovalsFromFileMock.mockReturnValue({

509+

allowlist: [],

510+

file: { version: 1, agents: {} },

511+

agent: {

512+

security: nodeSecurity,

513+

ask: nodeAsk,

514+

askFallback: "deny",

515+

autoAllowSkills: false,

516+

},

517+

});

518+

callGatewayToolMock.mockImplementation(

519+

async (method: string, _options: unknown, params: MockNodeInvokeParams | undefined) => {

520+

if (method === "exec.approvals.node.get") {

521+

return { file: { version: 1, agents: {} } };

522+

}

523+

if (method === "exec.approval.resolve") {

524+

return { payload: {} };

525+

}

526+

if (method !== "node.invoke") {

527+

throw new Error(`unexpected gateway method: ${method}`);

528+

}

529+

if (params?.command === "system.run.prepare") {

530+

return { payload: { plan: preparedPlan } };

531+

}

532+

if (params?.command === "system.run") {

533+

return {

534+

payload: {

535+

success: true,

536+

stdout: "ok",

537+

stderr: "",

538+

exitCode: 0,

539+

timedOut: false,

540+

},

541+

};

542+

}

543+

throw new Error(`unexpected node invoke command: ${String(params?.command)}`);

544+

},

545+

);

546+547+

const result = await executeNodeHostCommand({

548+

command: "bun ./script.ts",

549+

workdir: "/tmp/work",

550+

env: {},

551+

security: "allowlist",

552+

ask: "on-miss",

553+

autoReview: true,

554+

autoReviewer,

555+

defaultTimeoutSec: 30,

556+

approvalRunningNoticeMs: 0,

557+

warnings: [],

558+

agentId: "requested-agent",

559+

sessionKey: "requested-session",

560+

});

561+562+

expect(result.details?.status).toBe("approval-pending");

563+

expect(autoReviewer).not.toHaveBeenCalled();

564+

expect(createAndRegisterDefaultExecApprovalRequestMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);

565+

expect(

566+

callGatewayToolMock.mock.calls.some(([method]) => method === "exec.approval.resolve"),

567+

).toBe(false);

568+

},

569+

);

570+463571

it("auto-reviews strict inline-eval commands before asking a human", async () => {

464572

const autoReviewer = vi.fn<ExecAutoReviewer>(async () => ({

465573

decision: "allow-once",