codex review --base origin/main

```

Do not pass an inline prompt with `--base`; some CLI versions reject `--base` + `[PROMPT]` even though help text is ambiguous. If custom instructions are needed, prefer stdin prompt form (`codex review --base <ref> -`) as used by the helper.

Do not pass any prompt with `--base`. Some Codex CLI versions reject both inline

and stdin prompt forms, including the helper's `codex review --base <ref> -`,

with `--base <BRANCH> cannot be used with [PROMPT]`. If the helper hits this

error, run plain `codex review --base <ref>` and report that the helper prompt

injection was skipped.

If an open PR exists, use its actual base:

- supports `--dry-run`, `--parallel-tests`, and commit refs

- runs nested review with `--dangerously-bypass-approvals-and-sandbox --sandbox danger-full-access` by default

- injects maintainer-only OpenClaw validation policy into native Codex review when `OPENCLAW_TESTBOX=1` or `AUTOREVIEW_OPENCLAW_MAINTAINER_VALIDATION=1`, so local memory-heavy Node/Vitest checks are avoided in favor of Crabbox/Testbox proof

- branch mode may fail on Codex CLI versions that reject `--base` plus the helper's stdin prompt; on that exact parser error, rerun plain `codex review --base <ref>` instead of falling back to a non-Codex reviewer

- keeps accepting `--full-access`; use `--no-yolo` or `AUTOREVIEW_YOLO=0` to opt out

- still accepts legacy `CODEX_REVIEW_*` env vars when the matching `AUTOREVIEW_*` var is unset

- prints `autoreview clean: no accepted/actionable findings reported` when the selected review command exits 0