@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Skills own workflows; root owns hard policy and routing.
|
11 | 11 | - Fix/triage answers need source, tests, current/shipped behavior, and dependency contract proof. |
12 | 12 | - Reviews/answers: high confidence required. Default to exhaustive relevant codebase search/read, including owners, callers, siblings, tests, docs, and upstream/dependency contracts before verdict. Diff-only review is insufficient. |
13 | 13 | - Review default: read the whole changed function/module plus callers, callees, sibling implementations, adjacent tests, scoped docs, and dependency/Codex contracts before saying `good`, `bad`, `best fix`, `proof sufficient`, or posting a comment. If challenged, keep reading first; do not defend the earlier verdict until the missing path is checked. |
14 | | -- Dependency-touching work: direct dependency inspection is mandatory when feasible; do not rely on assumptions, wrappers, or memory. Most dependencies are OSS, so read their source/docs/types. Codex-related work: before any verdict, comment, approval, merge recommendation, or `proof sufficient` claim, inspect sibling `../codex` source for the exact protocol/runtime behavior involved; if missing, clone `https://github.com/openai/codex.git` there first. Do not rely on PR text, OpenClaw wrappers, generated schemas, memory, or prior bot reviews as a substitute. Cite Codex files/lines checked in final/review/comment. |
| 14 | +- Dependency-touching work: direct dependency inspection is mandatory when feasible; do not rely on assumptions, wrappers, or memory. Most dependencies are OSS, so read their source/docs/types. Codex-related work has a hard gate: the acting agent must personally inspect sibling `../codex` source for the exact protocol/runtime behavior before any verdict, comment, approval, merge recommendation, code change, or `proof sufficient` claim. If missing, clone `https://github.com/openai/codex.git` there first. Subagent reports, PR text, OpenClaw wrappers, generated schemas, memory, and prior bot reviews do not satisfy this gate. No direct `../codex` check means no Codex verdict. Cite Codex files/lines checked in final/review/comment. |
15 | 15 | - Dependency-backed behavior: read upstream docs/source/types first. No API/default/error/timing guesses. |
16 | 16 | - External API work: Google/search for additional proof. Prefer official docs/source/types; cite current proof. No memory-only API claims. |
17 | 17 | - Live-verify when feasible. Never print secrets. |
|
