docs: require issue summaries in agent replies · openclaw/openclaw@17c8602
steipete
·
2026-05-31
·
via Recent Commits to openclaw:main
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|
@@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ Skills own workflows; root owns hard policy and routing.
|
137 | 137 | - No unsolicited PR labels/retitles/rebases/fixups/landing. Comments/reviews ok only for reviewable findings, pre-merge proof, or close/duplicate reason after explicit close/sweep/landing request. |
138 | 138 | - Maintainer decision closes the cluster: if deciding reported behavior/proposed fix is not planned, comment+close all directly associated open issues/PRs unless explicitly told to keep one open. Associated means linked PRs/issues, duplicates, companion workaround PRs, and the canonical issue for the rejected behavior. |
139 | 139 | - Do not leave associated issues open for hypothetical future repros. Close with rationale; ask for a new issue or reopen only if concrete new evidence appears. Close comment states: decision, why, supported alternative, and what evidence would change the decision. |
| 140 | +- Issue/PR numbers need a short summary every time; assume the reader has not opened or read them. |
140 | 141 | - PR review answer: bug/behavior, URL(s), affected surface, provenance for regressions when traceable, best-fix judgment, evidence from code/tests/CI/current or shipped behavior. |
141 | 142 | - PR reviewable findings: post them on the PR, not chat-only, so author sees actionable feedback. |
142 | 143 | - Issue/PR final answer: last line is the full GitHub URL. |
|
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理,仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。