惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
U
Unit 42
IT之家
IT之家
Y
Y Combinator Blog
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
B
Blog
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
博客园 - 叶小钗
Jina AI
Jina AI
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
I
InfoQ
J
Java Code Geeks
F
Fortinet All Blogs
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
腾讯CDC
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
GbyAI
GbyAI
博客园 - 司徒正美
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
L
LangChain Blog

Recent Commits to openclaw:main

test: merge chat side-result checks · openclaw/openclaw@ddd2c2a test: merge cron history checks · openclaw/openclaw@f7eb746 test: merge responsive navigation shell checks · openclaw/openclaw@c2e4b47 docs(changelog): add codex oauth fixes · openclaw/openclaw@628e6cd test: merge navigation routing cases · openclaw/openclaw@5d8cecb Tests: mock channel registry bundled fallback · openclaw/openclaw@2b08233 Secrets: avoid broad web search discovery for single plugin config · openclaw/openclaw@a464f59 test: merge config view browser checks · openclaw/openclaw@20cf511 fix(status): align oauth health with runtime · openclaw/openclaw@eed7116 feat: add macOS screen snapshots for monitor preview (#67954) thanks … · openclaw/openclaw@f377db1 fix: report shared auth scopes in hello-ok (#67810) thanks @BunsDev · openclaw/openclaw@0b6c39b Auto-reply: avoid eager bundled route fallback · openclaw/openclaw@3ea1bf4 Tests: narrow session binding contract setup · openclaw/openclaw@54e4e16 fix(macOS): enable undo/redo in webchat composer text input (#34962) · openclaw/openclaw@00951dc Tests: speed up channel setup promotion · openclaw/openclaw@82b529a Docs: refresh agent instructions · openclaw/openclaw@5775fe2 fix(auth): serialize OAuth refresh across agents to fix #26322 (#67876) · openclaw/openclaw@8e79080 test: allow ollama public surface boundary test · openclaw/openclaw@7d4f1a6 Docs: add test performance guardrails · openclaw/openclaw@89706d3 Tests: restore context-engine usage proof · openclaw/openclaw@e4c4f95 Tests: slim context engine runtime coverage · openclaw/openclaw@74c198f ci: retry failed custom checkouts · openclaw/openclaw@0ee5baf test: trim duplicate provider auth onboarding cases · openclaw/openclaw@1ffc02e matrix: fix sessions_spawn --thread subagent session spawning (#67643) · openclaw/openclaw@1ce2596 test: reduce auth choice fixture churn · openclaw/openclaw@857b9cd test: mock health status config boundaries · openclaw/openclaw@9d5ab4a test: mock onboard config io boundary · openclaw/openclaw@299694d test: mock legacy state plugin boundaries · openclaw/openclaw@2713089 test: mock channel install boundaries · openclaw/openclaw@b945248 test: mock doctor preview channel boundaries · openclaw/openclaw@b1a3ad4
refactor(plugins): make provider discovery runtime explic...
vincentkoc · 2026-04-27 · via Recent Commits to openclaw:main

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ const providerDiscoveryMocks = vi.hoisted(() => ({

1111

resolveProviderOwners: vi.fn(),

1212

resolveBundledProviderCompatPluginIds: vi.fn(),

1313

resolveOwningPluginIdsForProvider: vi.fn(),

14-

resolvePluginDiscoveryProviders: vi.fn(),

14+

resolveRuntimePluginDiscoveryProviders: vi.fn(),

1515

resolveProviderContractPluginIdsForProviderAlias: vi.fn(),

1616

}));

1717

@@ -38,7 +38,8 @@ vi.mock("../../plugins/provider-discovery.js", async (importOriginal) => {

3838

const actual = await importOriginal<typeof import("../../plugins/provider-discovery.js")>();

3939

return {

4040

...actual,

41-

resolvePluginDiscoveryProviders: providerDiscoveryMocks.resolvePluginDiscoveryProviders,

41+

resolveRuntimePluginDiscoveryProviders:

42+

providerDiscoveryMocks.resolveRuntimePluginDiscoveryProviders,

4243

};

4344

});

4445

@@ -145,7 +146,7 @@ describe("loadProviderCatalogModelsForList", () => {

145146

providerDiscoveryMocks.resolveProviderContractPluginIdsForProviderAlias.mockImplementation(

146147

(provider: string) => (provider === "azure-openai-responses" ? ["openai"] : undefined),

147148

);

148-

providerDiscoveryMocks.resolvePluginDiscoveryProviders.mockImplementation(

149+

providerDiscoveryMocks.resolveRuntimePluginDiscoveryProviders.mockImplementation(

149150

async ({ onlyPluginIds }: { onlyPluginIds?: string[] }) =>

150151

defaultProviders.filter((provider) => onlyPluginIds?.includes(provider.pluginId)),

151152

);

@@ -183,7 +184,7 @@ describe("loadProviderCatalogModelsForList", () => {

183184

staticOnly: true,

184185

});

185186186-

expect(providerDiscoveryMocks.resolvePluginDiscoveryProviders).toHaveBeenCalledWith(

187+

expect(providerDiscoveryMocks.resolveRuntimePluginDiscoveryProviders).toHaveBeenCalledWith(

187188

expect.objectContaining({

188189

onlyPluginIds: ["moonshot"],

189190

requireCompleteDiscoveryEntryCoverage: true,

@@ -227,7 +228,7 @@ describe("loadProviderCatalogModelsForList", () => {

227228

});

228229229230

it("returns an empty catalog when a static provider catalog throws", async () => {

230-

providerDiscoveryMocks.resolvePluginDiscoveryProviders.mockResolvedValueOnce([

231+

providerDiscoveryMocks.resolveRuntimePluginDiscoveryProviders.mockResolvedValueOnce([

231232

{

232233

id: "moonshot",

233234

pluginId: "moonshot",

@@ -251,7 +252,9 @@ describe("loadProviderCatalogModelsForList", () => {

251252

});

252253253254

it("only skips registry for providers with actual static catalogs", async () => {

254-

providerDiscoveryMocks.resolvePluginDiscoveryProviders.mockResolvedValue([catalogOnlyProvider]);

255+

providerDiscoveryMocks.resolveRuntimePluginDiscoveryProviders.mockResolvedValue([

256+

catalogOnlyProvider,

257+

]);

255258256259

await expect(

257260

hasProviderStaticCatalogForFilter({

@@ -261,7 +264,7 @@ describe("loadProviderCatalogModelsForList", () => {

261264

}),

262265

).resolves.toBe(false);

263266264-

expect(providerDiscoveryMocks.resolvePluginDiscoveryProviders).toHaveBeenCalledWith(

267+

expect(providerDiscoveryMocks.resolveRuntimePluginDiscoveryProviders).toHaveBeenCalledWith(

265268

expect.objectContaining({

266269

onlyPluginIds: ["ollama"],

267270

requireCompleteDiscoveryEntryCoverage: true,

@@ -271,7 +274,7 @@ describe("loadProviderCatalogModelsForList", () => {

271274

});

272275273276

it("does not skip registry when a bundled provider has no lightweight static entry", async () => {

274-

providerDiscoveryMocks.resolvePluginDiscoveryProviders.mockResolvedValueOnce([]);

277+

providerDiscoveryMocks.resolveRuntimePluginDiscoveryProviders.mockResolvedValueOnce([]);

275278276279

await expect(

277280

hasProviderStaticCatalogForFilter({

@@ -297,7 +300,7 @@ describe("loadProviderCatalogModelsForList", () => {

297300

}),

298301

).resolves.toBe(false);

299302300-

expect(providerDiscoveryMocks.resolvePluginDiscoveryProviders).not.toHaveBeenCalled();

303+

expect(providerDiscoveryMocks.resolveRuntimePluginDiscoveryProviders).not.toHaveBeenCalled();

301304

});

302305303306

it("recognizes bundled provider hook aliases before the unknown-provider short-circuit", async () => {

@@ -317,7 +320,7 @@ describe("loadProviderCatalogModelsForList", () => {

317320

provider: { baseUrl: "https://workspace.example/v1", models: [] },

318321

}));

319322

providerDiscoveryMocks.resolveBundledProviderCompatPluginIds.mockReturnValue(["bundled-demo"]);

320-

providerDiscoveryMocks.resolvePluginDiscoveryProviders.mockResolvedValue([

323+

providerDiscoveryMocks.resolveRuntimePluginDiscoveryProviders.mockResolvedValue([

321324

{

322325

id: "bundled-demo",

323326

pluginId: "bundled-demo",

@@ -342,7 +345,7 @@ describe("loadProviderCatalogModelsForList", () => {

342345

...baseParams,

343346

});

344347345-

expect(providerDiscoveryMocks.resolvePluginDiscoveryProviders).toHaveBeenCalledWith(

348+

expect(providerDiscoveryMocks.resolveRuntimePluginDiscoveryProviders).toHaveBeenCalledWith(

346349

expect.objectContaining({

347350

onlyPluginIds: ["bundled-demo"],

348351

includeUntrustedWorkspacePlugins: false,