
























Abstract:Assurance arguments provide a clear and structured way to explain why stakeholders should trust that a system satisfies certain properties, yet widely used notations, this http URL Structuring Notation (GSN), typically lack an operational semantics for deriving assurance confidence. Existing approaches address structure and soundness but largely reason over truth values, not over confidence in the justification of claims. Subjective Logic (SL) offers a calculus of belief, disbelief, and uncertainty with operators for combining opinions, enabling confidence propagation under incomplete, conflicting, or subjective evidence. However, existing SL-based approaches do not provide a uniform, compositional semantics that covers all argument elements and relations to enable overall confidence assessment. We propose a confidence semantics that represents argument elements as SL opinions and maps relations between elements to SL operators modelling how confidence flows, effectively turning the argument into an analyzable confidence network. The approach provides explicit warrants, principled handling of context, preserved provenance, and compatibility with GSN, along with practical guidance using an exemplary assurance confidence assessment.
| Comments: | Accepted to the 21st European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC 2026), Canterbury, UK |
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.22213 [cs.AI] |
| (or arXiv:2605.22213v1 [cs.AI] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.22213 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
|
| Journal reference: | Proceedings of the 21st European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC 2026) |
From: Jessica Kelly [view email]
[v1]
Thu, 21 May 2026 09:17:27 UTC (206 KB)
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理,仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。