惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

罗磊的独立博客
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
The Cloudflare Blog
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
博客园 - 叶小钗
博客园 - 聂微东
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
腾讯CDC
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
V
V2EX
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
V
Visual Studio Blog
小众软件
小众软件
Jina AI
Jina AI
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
博客园 - Franky
量子位
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
P
Palo Alto Networks Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
I
Intezer
Project Zero
Project Zero
A
Arctic Wolf
P
Privacy International News Feed
V
Vulnerabilities – Threatpost
L
Lohrmann on Cybersecurity
S
Securelist
C
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA
C
CXSECURITY Database RSS Feed - CXSecurity.com
T
Tor Project blog
Hacker News - Newest:
Hacker News - Newest: "LLM"
S
Security @ Cisco Blogs
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
TaoSecurity Blog
TaoSecurity Blog
L
LINUX DO - 热门话题
G
GRAHAM CLULEY
Help Net Security
Help Net Security
N
News | PayPal Newsroom
W
WeLiveSecurity
G
Google Developers Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
C
Check Point Blog

Reform Government Surveillance

RGS Recommendations for 2025 FISA Reauthorization RGS Statement on the NDO Fairness Approval by the U.S. House Judiciary Committee RGS-Led Letter Urges DOJ to Act Against U.K. Orders Threatening Encryption RGS Statement on UK Only Technical Capability Notices (TCNs) RGS Statement Supporting Passage of New York ECPA Legislation RGS Statement on UK Order for Apple to Open Encrypted Cloud Data RGS responds to DOJ IG Report on DOJ Secrecy Orders targeting Congress RGS encourages governments to not ratify UN cybercrime convention RGS Statement on Section 702 Reauthorization Reform Government Surveillance Supports Senate Introduction of NDO Fairness Act RGS Statement on Section 702 Reauthorization Improvements to FISA Section 702 RGS Statement on Cooper Davis Act EU Adequacy Decision Provides Certainty and Privacy Protection RGS Applauds House Passage of NDO Fairness Act RGS Statement on the NDO Fairness Act Vote by the U.S. House Judiciary Committee RGS Statement on Issuance of Draft EU Adequacy Decision RGS Statement on EU-U.S. Date Privacy Framework RGS Applauds House Passage of NDO Fairness Act
Reform Government Surveillance Flags Concerns with Amendments to the UK Investigatory Powers Act
2024-01-23 · via Reform Government Surveillance

WASHINGTON – The Reform Government Surveillance (RGS) coalition today released a statement in advance of the United Kingdom House of Lords’ consideration of HL Bill 36, which would amend the Investigatory Powers Act of 2016. 

“The proposed amendments to the Investigatory Powers Act of 2016 include certain provisions that raise concerns around privacy and cybersecurity. 

“In particular, the proposed amendments require providers to notify the government in advance of technical product changes and give the Home Office effective veto power on necessary product updates. This could delay iterative updates necessary to keep products equipped with the latest security, privacy, and safety features. It could also restrict a company’s ability to innovate on new products or features or decommission outdated products. If passed in its current form, the amended text could impede necessary cybersecurity updates that protect the public, businesses, and government agencies from threats from criminals and foreign adversaries.

“The Bill would allow the UK Secretary of State to issue new product notification notices on companies and potentially halt product changes without transparency or adequate independent judicial review.  This means products that strengthen privacy and security for users may be stalled without oversight or public awareness.

“RGS urges further consideration and more narrow targeting of proposed changes to the Investigatory Powers Act.”