惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
博客园 - 司徒正美
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
量子位
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
博客园 - 聂微东
博客园 - 【当耐特】
J
Java Code Geeks
美团技术团队
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
H
Help Net Security
V
V2EX
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
博客园 - Franky
罗磊的独立博客
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
A
About on SuperTechFans
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
Y
Y Combinator Blog
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research

Domain Name Wire | Domain Name News

Graen domain appraisal review: it’s fine, but not worth your time Donald Trump forces ICANN to move meeting again Losing DropCatch bidder tries reverse hijacking domain name Construction equipment company tries reverse domain name hijacking Appraise.software domain appraisal review: no backup data, but bulk tools .Co domain registry nukes expired domain auctions Saw.com domain appraisal review: struggles with two word domains What percentage of new domain registrations are for malicious purposes? Domains in Stockholm – DNW Podcast #589 Eighteen domain names end users recently acquired Lease-to-own statistics from a large domain portfolio Escrow.com: .Com hits record high, .ai settles Panel denies cybersquatting claim against RapidPay.com NameWorth domain appraisals: based on old data? Sedo makes cuts and Wix lays off 20% of staff NameJet and SnapNames report: 156 recent domain sales Dynadot domain appraisal review: Fewer “WTF” moments than other appraisal tools GoExpired domain appraisals review: a tight range for most valuations Tucows: shorter domain verification window could create more problems than it solves Recap: Nordic Domain Days 2026 ICANN says GoDaddy’s Whois contact form is OK Appraise.net domain appraisal review: Big numbers, little consistency Interesting Verisign data about domain usage and renewal rates Full-time domain investing – DNW Podcast #588 Network Solutions duped by fake UDRP notice GoDaddy’s appraisal tool struggles to keep up, but has uses End user domain sales: Atom Edition Estibot review: Strong on some domains, weak on others Insurance company AXA loses second cybersquatting dispute against axa.org OpusDNS acquires fruits.co domain sales platform
Atom domain appraisals review: strong supporting data pro...
Andrew Allem · 2026-05-25 · via Domain Name Wire | Domain Name News

Atom provides rich data for each domain it values.

Atom appraisal screenshot
Atom’s appraisal tool provides good supporting data, including comparable domain sales.

This is part of Domain Name Wire’s review of automated domain appraisal tools.

Atom is the fastest-iterating domain aftermarket in the business. How does its appraisal tool stack up?

Atom provides perhaps the most robust data backup for its appraisals among all the tools we tested. Building on its other tools to help domain investors, you see cross-TLD registration information, signals like whether the name matches an existing app, sell-through rates for the root words, and very good comparables data.

The company has been testing showing comparables on domain landing pages, which helps justify the asking price. As we’ve said before, comparables are the number one way to justify a domain’s asking price.

Let’s take a look at how Atom stacked up to the competition.

Two word brandables

We evaluated two domain names in this category: MakeMatter.com, which sold for $15,000, and PressBridge.com, which sold for $5,000.

Both of these domains are in the sweet spot for two dictionary word brandables of $3,000-$15,000. While some sellers hold out for higher amounts, their data will show these domains sell for much more. But looking at overall sale data, it’s reasonable for an appraisal system to return anything in this price range for this type of domain.

Atom appraised MakeMatter.com at $4,499 and PressBridge.com at $8,799.

Even though it valued the domain that sold for less for more than the other, recall what we pointed out in our intro post: a lot of this has to do with how the sellers priced these domains.

More importantly, Atom backed up its valuation: PressBridge is registered in more TLDs, its keyword sales data points to high STRs, and Atom lists comparables. In other words, it shows its work, and that’s the most important thing for a domain appraisal.

Atom also smartly judged that our unregistered test domain, CloudToaster.com, wasn’t worth much. It said it was worth <$1,000.

One word, high value .com

Once again, we ran Dragonfly.com as a test of high value domains.

Atom returned a valuation of “> $1 million”.

This is a good example of an appraisal tool not getting too specific and understanding its limitations. It reports all seven figure domains as merely being worth at least $1 million.

Popular ccTLDs

We ran a solid one word .io, and a plural .ai of lesser quality through Atom’s appraisal tool.

Mike sold expedite.io for $14,995. Atom valued it at $20,500

We also valued kickers.ai, which Andrew sold for $8,000. Atom valued it at $34,000.

On DNW Podcast #580 in March, Atom CEO Darpan Munjal told Andrew that a quarter of the company’s sales revenue comes from .ai domains. So we don’t want to question its valuation, especially with .ai’s trajectory. That said, Atom’s .ai appraisals for recently sold .ai domains are often much higher than the sales prices.

Exact Match descriptive

Exact match, category defining domains aren’t as popular as they used to be. These days, it’s all about the one word brandable dictionary term.

But there’s no doubt WaterFilters.com has a lot of value. It’s for sale for $3.5 million. We don’t know what it will sell for, but this is a huge business, especially for online sales. It’s a great domain.

Atom valued the domain at $66,000, which was in the middle of the pack of the tools we tested.

Three and four letter domains

Three and four letter domains are some of the most liquid domains on the market.

We tested a pronounceable CVCV .com domain, dujo.com, that is listed on Afternic for $36,000.

Our goal was to see if the algorithms caught that this was not just a random set of letters. Pronounceable, brandable four letter domains are generally worth more than unpronounceable random letters.

Atom valued it at $21,000, toward the lower end of the valuation tools we tested.

We also tested a four letter, non-pronounceable. Logan Flatt sold MOTG.com for $14,888. Atom valued it at $10,499.

These valuations seem fair. It’s good that Atom, which has focused on brandable domains, recognized the difference between these domains.

For a three letter domain, we tested VJN.com. It’s listed for sale on Afternic for $39,000. V and J aren’t great letters, so this is likely on the lower end of three letter .com values.

Atom valued the domain at $114,766. Given that the domain is listed for sale at a cheaper price and hasn’t sold, this seems high. That said, names like this do sell in the six figure range. It would have helped if Atom had shown comparables for this domain, but the appraisal stated it didn’t have any.

New TLDs

New top level domains are very hard to value because there is very little sales data for most of them.

We tried a couple of new TLDs.

Andrew sold voicemail.app for $5,000 last year. He bought it in Early Access when the TLD launched. Atom valued it at $2,799. Atom didn’t provide comps.

Mark Levine sold timber.homes for $2,899. Here again, Atom understands its limitations: it said it couldn’t value .homes domains. Frankly, given that NameBio has only 24 .homes domains in its database, we don’t know how anyone could value these domains.

Final analysis

We agree with many of the numbers Atom provided. But more importantly, Atom provides a rich dataset for each domain, supporting its valuation. It doesn’t provide comps for all domains, but when it does, this is great ammunition for negotiations.

Get Our Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest analysis and news about the domain name industry by joining our mailing list.

No spam, unsubscribe anytime.