Large Language Models (LLMs) can be seen as compressed knowledge bases, but it remains unclear what knowledge they truly contain and how far their knowledge boundary extends. Existing benchmarks are mostly static and provide limited support for systematic knowledge probing. In this paper, we propose an interactive agentic framework to systematically extract and quantify the knowledge of LLMs. Our method includes four adaptive exploration policies to probe knowledge at different granularity. To ensure the quality of extracted knowledge, we introduce a three-stage knowledge processing pipeline that combines vector-based filtering to remove strict duplicates, LLM-based adjudication to resolve ambiguous semantic overlap, and domain relevance auditing to retain valid knowledge units. Through extensive experiments, we find that Recursive Taxonomy is the most effective exploration strategy. We also observe a clear knowledge scaling law, where larger models consistently recover more knowledge. In addition, we identify a Pass@1 versus Pass@k trade-off: domain-specialized models achieve higher initial accuracy but experience rapid degradation, while general-purpose models maintain stable performance over extended extraction. Finally, our results show that differences in training data composition lead to distinct and measurable knowledge profiles across model families, reflecting how pretraining shapes each model's parametric knowledge.