Abstract:Estimating task progress requires reasoning over long-horizon dynamics rather than recognizing static visual content. While modern Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel at describing what is visible, it remains unclear whether they can infer how far a task has progressed from partial observations. To this end, we introduce Progress-Bench, a benchmark for systematically evaluating progress reasoning in VLMs. Beyond benchmarking, we further explore a human-inspired two-stage progress reasoning paradigm through both training-free prompting and training-based approach based on curated dataset ProgressLM-45K. Experiments on 14 VLMs show that most models are not yet ready for task progress estimation, exhibiting sensitivity to demonstration modality and viewpoint changes, as well as poor handling of unanswerable cases. While training-free prompting that enforces structured progress reasoning yields limited and model-dependent gains, the training-based ProgressLM-3B achieves consistent improvements even at a small model scale, despite being trained on a task set fully disjoint from the evaluation tasks. Further analyses reveal characteristic error patterns and clarify when and why progress reasoning succeeds or fails. Website: this https URL
| Comments: | ACL 2026 Camera Ready Version |
| Subjects: | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2601.15224 [cs.CV] |
| (or arXiv:2601.15224v2 [cs.CV] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.15224 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
From: Jianshu Zhang [view email]
[v1]
Wed, 21 Jan 2026 17:56:59 UTC (4,610 KB)
[v2]
Thu, 21 May 2026 22:24:08 UTC (4,572 KB)
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理，仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。