Abstract:The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has extended text generation tasks into the literary domain. However, AI-generated literary creations has raised increasingly prominent issues of creative authenticity and ethics in literary world, making the detection of LLM-generated literary texts essential and urgent. While previous works have made significant progress in detecting AI-generated text, it has yet to address classical Chinese poetry. Due to the unique linguistic features of classical Chinese poetry, such as strict metrical regularity, a shared system of poetic imagery, and flexible syntax, distinguishing whether a poem is authored by AI presents a substantial challenge. To address these issues, we introduce ChangAn, a benchmark for detecting LLM-generated classical Chinese poetry that containing total 30,664 poems, 10,276 are human-written poems and 20,388 poems are generated by four popular LLMs. Based on ChangAn, we conducted a systematic evaluation of 12 AI detectors, investigating their performance variations across different text granularities and generation strategies. Our findings highlight the limitations of current Chinese text detectors, which fail to serve as reliable tools for detecting LLM-generated classical Chinese poetry. These results validate the effectiveness and necessity of our proposed ChangAn benchmark. Our dataset and code are available at this https URL.
| Comments: | Accepted to ACL 2026 Main Conference |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2604.10101 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2604.10101v2 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.10101 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
From: Tian Lan [view email]
[v1]
Sat, 11 Apr 2026 08:52:08 UTC (7,406 KB)
[v2]
Thu, 16 Apr 2026 07:39:05 UTC (4,879 KB)
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理，仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。