惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

D
DataBreaches.Net
IT之家
IT之家
博客园_首页
博客园 - 【当耐特】
V
V2EX
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
G
Google Developers Blog
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
F
Fortinet All Blogs
GbyAI
GbyAI
腾讯CDC
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
I
InfoQ
H
Help Net Security
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
B
Blog RSS Feed
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
The Cloudflare Blog
博客园 - 叶小钗
雷峰网
雷峰网
量子位

The Register

ShinyHunters claims dump puts 119K Vimeo emails in the wild Shadow IT has given way to shadow AI. Enter AI-BOMs Zed team releases version 1.0 of Rust-built editor: Traditional editor and AI tool Microsoft boss tells investors the company is working to 'win back fans' What type of 'C2 on a sleep cycle' do they leave behind? Novel Chinese spy group found in critical networks in Poland, Asia NASA boss: Make Pluto A Planet Again GitHub says sorry and vows to do better as uptime slips and devs complain Age checks could turn internet into an ID checkpoint, complains Proton CEO Microsoft gives your Word documents an AI co-author you didn’t ask for Datadog digs down into GPU efficiency as AI costs soar If malware via monitor cables is a matter of national security, this might be the gadget for you Thunderbird in hand worth 2 Outlooks as fresh FOSS fave and Firefox arrive Grafana offers AI assistant for free, warns users not to go mad Right to repair champ Framework punts modular 13in laptop with Core Ultra Series 3 France's 'Secure' ID agency probes breach as crooks claim 19M records Scotland Yard can keep using live facial recognition on Londoners, say judges UK tribunal sends £2B claim accusing Microsoft of overcharging for licensing to trial Nation-states want to cause harm, not just steal cash - stop handing your cyber defenses to the cheapest contractor Murder, she wrote: Ex-FBI chief wants some ransomware crims charged with homicide Phone-to-satellite use goes into orbit, growing 25% in 8 months macOS ClickFix attacks deliver AppleScript stealers to snarf credentials, wallets Anthropic bakes memory fixes into Bun 1.1.13 as developers complain of leaks The spaghettified DBMS chart that shows Oracle's crown is slowly slipping Yet another ex-ransomware negotiator admits turning rogue after payoff from crimelords FAA grounds Blue Origin's New Glenn as it probes missed satellite delivery 'mishap' AMD's Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 Dual Edition tested: Gratuitous overkill with a price to match AI-assisted intruders pwned Vercel via OAuth abuse and a pilfered employee account Crook claims to leak 'video surveillance footage' of companies Met police trials snoop tech platform in push to cuff more London shoplifters England's school phone ban gets teeth, just in time to bite no one
NASA Inspector fears new spacesuits won’t be ready for Mo...
Simon Sharwo · 2026-04-21 · via The Register

The NASA Office of Inspector General, the aerospace agency’s auditor, fears that work on next-generation spacesuits won’t finish in time to use them for the planned Artemis III Moon landing mission in 2028.

In a report [PDF] published on Monday, the Inspector General points out that NASA kicked off its quest for next-gen spacesuits with 2022’s Exploration Extravehicular Activity Services (xEVAS) program, which called for private suppliers to develop two suits: one to handle microgravity at the International Space Station (ISS) and another to wear on the moon.

NASA allocated $3.1 billion to the contracts and selected Axiom Space and Collins Aerospace to work on the project. The latter dropped out in 2024 after deciding it couldn’t hit the required deadlines.

The report says NASA’s delivery dates “were overly optimistic and ultimately proved unachievable” and warns that past experience of spacesuit development suggests Axiom Space won’t have even demo suits ready before 2031.

That’s bad because NASA’s plans call for a moon landing in 2028, while the ISS will end its mission in 2030.

The Office of Inspector General blames the xEVAS contracts for the mess.

“NASA’s choice to use a firm-fixed-price, service-based acquisition strategy for xEVAS aligns with the Agency’s strategic decision to shift the risk of cost overruns to the contractor, as well as help foster a commercial space economy,” the report notes. “However, in this case, the firm-fixed-price contract approach conflicted with the developmental nature of next-generation spacesuits, which carry higher levels of technical, financial, and schedule risk.”

The report also notes that until NASA issued xEVAS contracts, no commercial market for spacesuits existed. The document also criticizes “overly burdensome requirements like requiring offerors to bid on both microgravity and lunar spacesuits” as that limited the pool of companies capable of doing the job.

“In our judgment, while firm-fixed-price and service-based contracts can be viable options for certain NASA procurements, applying that approach to a developmental effort like xEVAS introduced its own set of risks to achieving NASA’s goals,” the report finds.

Among those risks were NASA identifying “systemic management issues” related to Collins Aerospace’s work on the suits it currently provides for the ISS, and Axiom Space having zero experience building spacesuits.

Another NASA blunder saw the agency decide not to set a standard for all spacesuit manufacturers to meet. The report finds that regrettable because spacesuits “must interface with almost every Artemis spacecraft and asset, including the commercial Human Landing System vehicles, the Lunar Terrain Vehicle, pressurized crewed rovers, and habitation modules.”

Without a standard, the Office of Inspector General worries that “differences in systems – from airlocks, hatch sizes, and suit interfaces, both government and commercial – may limit full interoperability.”

Such limitations have already emerged: The report notes that Blue Origin is one of the companies bidding to build the lunar lander for future Artemis missions and used a NASA reference document to design the “don/doff area” in which astronauts put on and remove spacesuits. Axiom Space, however, decided to use a different connector than the one in NASA’s reference document.

“For the Axiom spacesuit to be compatible with the Blue Moon lander, Blue Origin must either make significant changes to the crew module airlock layout or develop its own don/doff hardware to support Axiom’s design, potentially increasing the cost to NASA,” the report found. “A uniform spacesuit standard could have mitigated this issue.”

NASA might have a way out of this because it can appoint new suppliers under xEVAS, and three companies – SpaceX, Genesis Engineering Solutions, and ILC Dover – are already working on suitable spacesuits.

But if Axiom Space doesn’t succeed, the report warns NASA may need to revert to its current spacesuits which are much less capable than those planned for use in future, and therefore “significantly adjust its lunar plans.”

Those plans currently call for 2027’s Artemis III to test docking in space, and for 2028’s Artemis IV mission to land astronauts on the Moon.

Work on the vehicle that will make that landing is under way, with SpaceX and Blue Origin competing to win the gig. There’s no guarantee either company will be ready for 2028. And as another recent Office of Inspector General report found, both designs have potential flaws. ®