惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

G
Google Developers Blog
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
小众软件
小众软件
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
美团技术团队
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
博客园 - 【当耐特】
V
V2EX
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
博客园 - 叶小钗
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
量子位
罗磊的独立博客
月光博客
月光博客
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
博客园_首页
P
Proofpoint News Feed
Jina AI
Jina AI
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
博客园 - 司徒正美
腾讯CDC

PT

test article category | PT example article grouped fields | PT Multi-lingual sales toolkit | PT Improving auditing skills with xAPI Simulated high-quality CPR game | PT Sales training | PT In-person training sessions | PT Forensic accounting certification | PT
Example Article | PT
2021-12-09 · via PT

If your organization uses on-premises storage area network (SAN)-based storage, you might be familiar with its benefits, such as significant capacity, quick performance for transactional databases, and reliability. However, as the storage ages, maintaining performance or capacity for data growth could be difficult. To meet this need and support workloads that require low latency and high throughput, AWS offers an on-demand SAN in the Cloud solution comprised of a single data volume backed by two EBS io2 Block Express volumes and an EC2 r5b.24xlarge instance.

We ran benchmarking tests to compare transactional database performance of this Amazon SAN in the Cloud solution and an on-premises mid-level HPE 3PAR StoreServ 8450 SAN solution that we configured similarly to the AWS solution. We ran a synthetic I/O workload and an online transaction processing (OLTP) workload on the two solutions. Both the instance and the on-premises solution used Intel® Xeon® processors from the same generation (Cascade Lake), featured the same number of cores and threads, and offered the same amount of memory. To learn more about our configurations and why we chose them, see the full report.

We found that the AWS SAN in the Cloud solution featuring an EC2 R5b instance and EBS io2 Block Express storage:

  • Delivered 26 percent higher throughput during a synthetic I/O workload. In a 100-percent sequential-read I/O profile with 64k-sized blocks, the EBS io2 Block Express storage and EC2 r5b instance offered greater throughput (in GB per second) compared to the on-premises SAN solution. 

test1

  • Processed 3 percent more NOPM for an OLTP workload. The EC2 r5b.24xlarge instance backed by two EBS io2 Block Express volumes processed more new orders per minute (NOPM) than the on-premises SAN solution, a three percent gain.

test2

With the performance we saw from an AWS SAN in the Cloud solution of EBS io2 Block Express volumes and an EC2 r5b instance, your business could lift and shift business-critical OLTP workloads to free up on-premises SAN capacity for other workloads, meeting current usage levels and getting scalability for data growth.

To find out more about our testing and results, read the report at http://facts.pt/JIBjXqh.

This blog was commissioned by AWS.