惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Jina AI
Jina AI
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
B
Blog
L
LangChain Blog
Y
Y Combinator Blog
美团技术团队
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
G
Google Developers Blog
量子位
博客园_首页
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
C
Check Point Blog
D
Docker
小众软件
小众软件
The Cloudflare Blog
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
博客园 - 聂微东
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
GbyAI
GbyAI
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
IT之家
IT之家

NASA Science

Cosmic Origins at AAS 248, June 2026 - NASA Science Cosmic Structure SIG Seminar, 30 April 2026 - NASA Science CMB SAG Meeting, 24 April 2026 - NASA Science BBX SAG Meeting, 30 April 2026 - NASA Science Early Career Investigator Program – Earth Science (ROSES A.11) - NASA Science XR SIG Seminar, 1 May 2026 - NASA Science Night and (Earth) Day - NASA SWERV: High-Impact Historical Case Study - NASA Science AAS Meeting 248, June 2026 - NASA Science Earth Day 2026: Posters and Virtual Backgrounds - NASA Science Advancing Earth Observation at NASA since Release of Earthrise Photo - NASA Science X-59 Adds Freedom 250 Logo - NASA Belts of Green in the Washington Suburbs - NASA Science Artemis II Mission Milestones: An Image and Video Recap Curiosity Blog, Sols 4867-4872: Sand Fill In Antofagasta Crater and Finding Our Next Drill Target NASA Invites Media to Jordan Artemis Accords Signing Ceremony New NASA Views of Earth, From (S)PACE - NASA Science Crew Studies Biotech on Tuesday to Advance Health and Space Economy NASA Invests in Small Businesses Innovating for Space and Earth NASA at SXSW: Johnson Director Vanessa Wyche on Why Artemis Changes Everything Researchers: How Would You Extract Meaningful Insights from Just Four Astronauts? BBX SAG Meeting, 23 April 2026 - NASA Science Thailand’s Krabi Coast - NASA Science AI/ML STIG Lecture Series, 20 April 2026 - NASA Science SWERV: Training Overview and Agenda - NASA Science SWERV: REAL-TIME CAPABILITIES AND IONOSPHERIC DISRUPTIONS OF COMMUNICATIONS - NASA Science SWERV: Operationally Significant Phenomena and Impacts for Ground Operations - NASA Science SWERV: Space Weather Impacts on Satellites - NASA Science SWERV: Space Weather Chain of Events - NASA Science CSDA Quality Assessment Report Evaluates Satellogic NewSat Data - NASA Science
How can we identify worlds around other stars that could ...
Anthony Chan · 2026-05-14 · via NASA Science

We’ve now discovered several thousand planets that orbit around other stars! What’s more, based on the number of exoplanets that we’ve detected by looking at just a small fraction of the total number of stars that are in our galaxy, we’ve estimated that there are probably way more than 100 billion planets within the galaxy. That’s a whole lot of worlds. If you were to try counting one of those planets each second, it would take over 3,000 years to count them all! With all of those worlds out there, do you think it’s possible that any of them are home to other living things? If there are any alien biospheres out there, then we need to consider how to find them and how we can learn more about them. Our Earth is the only place we know of so far that has life, so it might be important for alien worlds to be a bit like Earth in order to have life. For instance, our Earth lies within the Goldilocks Zone of our solar system. The “Goldilocks Zone” is a region around a star where the starlight warming the surface of a planet might allow the planet to have liquid water on its surface. Just like in the story of Goldilocks and the Three Bears, where Papa Bear’s porridge was too hot and Mama Bear’s porridge was too cold, but Baby Bear’s porridge was “just right” for eating, some planets are either so close to their star that it’s too hot for liquid water on the surface and others are so far from their star that it’s too cold for liquid water on the surface, but some planets are in the area where it’s “just right” to have rivers and lakes and oceans on their surfaces. If having liquid water on a surface is important for life, then looking for worlds in the Goldilocks Zones around stars might be one good place to look.

When it comes to looking for Earth-like planets, another important thing to consider is the type of star (or stars) that a planet orbits. For instance, stars will change in how much radiation they emit over time, so the Goldilocks Zone changes over time as well. And not only that, but some stars might just be dangerous for life altogether. Larger stars have much wider Goldilocks Zones and therefore might have a greater potential for more planets to lie within that zone. However, large stars also burn through their hydrogen fuel quickly and have shorter lives because of it. The largest stars may only be in their main sequence phase for 10 million years before they move to supergiant and then supernova phases. That might not be enough time for life to evolve to a point where we could detect it in the atmosphere of an exoplanet. We might then say that we should look for planets around stars that live for a long time, but that could also be a problem. The smallest stars, the red dwarf stars, will be in their main sequence phase for 100s of billions to trillions of years. That should be plenty of time for life to develop. However, since those stars are a lot smaller, their Goldilocks Zones are much smaller and much closer to the star, and this can present a variety of problems. For instance, since the Goldilocks Zone is much closer to the star, some scientists have hypothesized that exoplanets around red dwarf stars are more likely to be “tidally locked”. Tidal locking is when a celestial object rotates in the same period that it revolves, such that one side of it is always facing in. Our moon is almost tidally locked, which is why we can only see one side of the Moon from Earth. A planet that is tidally locked would have one side facing its star all the time. This could be problematic for the evolution of life, but we don’t know for sure yet. Another concern for planets around red dwarf stars is that they might experience a lot of solar flares that could kill living things (red dwarf stars tend to be more variable, meaning that they go through times where they release lots of radiation and times when they release little). So maybe the biggest stars and the smallest stars aren’t the best for finding alien life.

It seems like looking for Earth-like worlds is the right way to go about looking for alien biospheres, but there are also other possible places where alien life might exist. For instance, there’s a chance that worlds that have subsurface oceans could be important places for life. We have places like Europa and Enceladus, moons with subsurface oceans, here in our solar system. However, these are moons of very large planets. It turns out that, while finding exoplanets is hard, finding exomoons around big planets is going to be even harder. And, on top of that, if there are biospheres within those subsurface oceans, we might not be able to see any evidence of them using our telescopes. So, even if these worlds might be good places for life to originate and develop, maybe they aren’t great places to look for life until we have better technology. What about life in atmospheres? Could you imagine a world like Jupiter or Saturn having a biosphere floating around in all of those clouds? We don’t know yet if such worlds exist, but some people have wondered if looking for signs of life in the atmospheres of giant planets could also be one way to find alien life. There are definitely lots of worlds out there and that means that there are lots of possible places to look for life. As our telescopes and our technology get better and better, we’re even more likely to be able to find signs of life if there are alien biospheres out there!