惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

B
Blog
A
About on SuperTechFans
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
Y
Y Combinator Blog
罗磊的独立博客
J
Java Code Geeks
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
G
Google Developers Blog
U
Unit 42
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
博客园 - Franky
Jina AI
Jina AI
F
Fortinet All Blogs
H
Help Net Security
B
Blog RSS Feed
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
博客园 - 司徒正美
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
C
Check Point Blog
GbyAI
GbyAI

OpenStack - Recent changes [en]

Security Notes - OpenStack OSSN/OSSN-0098 - OpenStack User:ZlixnupTop - OpenStack OpenStack OpenStack Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting - OpenStack User:Jibzfloopgraip - OpenStack OpenStack OpenStack OpenStack OpenStack OpenStack User:Normanroppy - OpenStack OpenStack OpenStack OpenStack OpenStack OpenStack OpenStack OpenStack OpenStack OpenStack OpenStack Difference between revisions of "Meetings/QATeamMeeting" OpenStack Difference between revisions of "CinderMeetings" OpenStack OpenStack OpenStack User:Mufftroxkeere - OpenStack
“Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting”的版本间的差异 - OpenStack
Frickler · 2026-06-19 · via OpenStack - Recent changes [en]
第55行: 第55行:
 

*** We have 16gb nodes, but in two clouds, rax-classic and vexxhost, they have fewer vcpus than their 8gb counterparts, so we need to use 32gb nodes to compensate

 

*** We have 16gb nodes, but in two clouds, rax-classic and vexxhost, they have fewer vcpus than their 8gb counterparts, so we need to use 32gb nodes to compensate

 

*** Are we okay with this?  Alternatives?

 

*** Are we okay with this?  Alternatives?

+

** Dealing with alien zuul config errors in the openstack tenant (frickler 20260617)

 +

*** Currently there are still 185 zuul config errors in the openstack tenant, despite my year-long struggle to get rid of them.

 +

*** Most of these are from "alien" repos (74 airship, 29 starlingx) that I have no motivation to fix myself with my OpenStack hats on

 +

*** Efforts to motivate these projects to clean up their errors themselves have mostly failed

 +

*** I still believe that cleaning these up and being able to easily identify fresh errors is important for the healthyness of the CI setup as a whole

 +

*** One pretty strong action would be to move these repos into their own tenant(s) or a different shared one like opendev

 +

*** I acknowledge that without further work this would break their CI setup, but I'm questioning now whether that impact would be worse than the impact the current situation has on my ability to maintain the OpenStack CI

 +

*** Other ideas or opinions are welcome

  
 

* Open discussion

 

* Open discussion


2026年6月19日 (五) 10:48的最新版本

目录

  • 1 Weekly Project Infrastructure team meeting
    • 1.1 Agenda for next meeting
    • 1.2 Upcoming Project Renames
    • 1.3 Previous meetings

Weekly Project Infrastructure team meeting

The OpenDev Team holds public weekly meetings in #opendev-meeting on OFTC, Tuesdays at 1900 UTC. Everyone interested in infrastructure and process surrounding automated testing and deployment is encouraged to attend.

Please feel free to add agenda items (and your IRC nick in parenthesis).

Agenda for next meeting

  • Announcements
  • Actions from last meeting
  • Specs Review
  • Topics
    • Upgrading Old Servers (clarkb 20230627)
      • https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/opendev-server-upgrade-planning Central tracking document which may link to more host specific documents
      • Next on the list are graphite and backup servers
      • backup03.ca-ymq-1.vexxhost.opendev.org has been launched and is being backed up too
        • Preliminary checks all looked good. Should double check that all expected hosts are backing up to this server and confirm that a backup is mountable and looks accurate.
      • Remember to use launch-node's --config-drive flag when booting new Noble nodes in Rax Classic
    • Deploying a Prometheus for Server Metrics (clarkb 20260331)
    • Gerrit Account Cleanups (clarkb 20260317)
      • Since the upgrade to Gerrit notedb we've had account inconsistencies that prevent us from push to the external ids ref/table directly.
      • clarkb did a bunch of work to get the number down from hundreds to about 33 consistency errors before stalling out.
      • The tail was the most difficult as it wasn't clear what the more appropriate fix for each account would be
      • Since then it has been years and those accounts are likely inactive and unused. We can rerun the Gerrit consistency check, feed the info back through our audit script then decide if we need to be careful with any of these accounts
      • Chances are we can simply disable them all and remove the conflicting external ids.
      • If we take good notes we can reconstruct the accounts as appropriate after the fact without Gerrit downtime should one of these users show up and wonder what happened.
    • Gerrit 3.13 Upgrade Followup (clarkb 20260414)
      • We upgraded Gerrit last Friday to 3.13.6 from 3.12.7
      • https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/gerrit-upgrade-3.13 Upgrade plan and process that was used
      • Seems to be working, but a few things have been noticed
        • The lack of robot comment apis has created some questions. This was anticipated and we expect hard refreshes of browser clients to fix this
        • The robot comment api removal also broke gertty
        • corvus has suggested that Zuul stop using robot comments early as these comments effectively disappear post upgrade
        • Custom "Your -> Foo" links in the web ui can be set to open in new tabs. This is configurable through your user preferences in Gerrit
        • Some changes show up as conflicting with each other despite having a direct git tree relationship
      • https://review.opendev.org/c/opendev/system-config/+/991945/ and children will drop Gerrit 3.12 images, add 3.14 images, and test a 3.13 to 3.14 upgrade just as soon as we're confident we won't rollback to 3.12.
    • Upgrading Grafana (clarkb 20260609)
    • Zuul reporting empty public_v6 addresses for test nodes (clarkb 20260519)
      • Zuul is reporting public_v6 values of for test nodes that do have working ipv6 in clouds like rax classic and ovh
      • This may be an openstack api bug, an openstacksdk bug, or a zuul-launcher bug.
      • Be aware this may impact the behavior of some test jobs.
      • We will need to dig into why this is happening to understand it better.
    • Larger VM sizes for tests (corvus 20260618)
      • corvus has been testing python 3.14 with zuul; zuul unit tests now use slightly more than 8GB under 3.14
      • We have 16gb nodes, but in two clouds, rax-classic and vexxhost, they have fewer vcpus than their 8gb counterparts, so we need to use 32gb nodes to compensate
      • Are we okay with this? Alternatives?
    • Dealing with alien zuul config errors in the openstack tenant (frickler 20260617)
      • Currently there are still 185 zuul config errors in the openstack tenant, despite my year-long struggle to get rid of them.
      • Most of these are from "alien" repos (74 airship, 29 starlingx) that I have no motivation to fix myself with my OpenStack hats on
      • Efforts to motivate these projects to clean up their errors themselves have mostly failed
      • I still believe that cleaning these up and being able to easily identify fresh errors is important for the healthyness of the CI setup as a whole
      • One pretty strong action would be to move these repos into their own tenant(s) or a different shared one like opendev
      • I acknowledge that without further work this would break their CI setup, but I'm questioning now whether that impact would be worse than the impact the current situation has on my ability to maintain the OpenStack CI
      • Other ideas or opinions are welcome
  • Open discussion

Upcoming Project Renames

(any additions should mention original->new full names and link to the corresponding project-config rename change in Gerrit) Changes should have their topic set to project-rename.

Previous meetings

Previous meetings, with their notes and logs, can be found at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/ and earlier at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ci/