惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

雷峰网
雷峰网
爱范儿
爱范儿
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
博客园 - Franky
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
博客园 - 聂微东
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
罗磊的独立博客
博客园 - 叶小钗
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
小众软件
小众软件
博客园 - 司徒正美
博客园 - 【当耐特】
IT之家
IT之家

Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog

EU Cyber Resilience Act Reporting Obligations Take Effect for Manufacturers Delaware Expands State Privacy Law Dutch DPA Fines Uber Over Automated Decisions Affecting Drivers European Commission Designates ChatGPT, Reddit, and Roblox Under the Digital Services Act China Issues New Rules on Cyberspace Security Inspection Court Approves Meta Settlement With 29 States Over Alleged Harms to Children and Teens FTC Proposes Enforcement Policy Statement on Personalized Pricing New Jersey Enacts the Kids Code Act with Privacy-by-Default and Safety-by-Design Obligations White House Memorandum Establishes Framework for Government-Directed Private-Sector Cyber Operations FTC, California and Utah Sue Telehealth Company Hims & Hers for Deceptive and Unlawful Privacy Practices CalPrivacy Settles with Two Data Brokers over Registration Failures and Privacy Violations New York Attorney General Releases Final Rules for SAFE for Kids Act EDPB Adopts Guidelines on Anonymous Data, Web Scraping, and Blockchain China Publishes Official Q&A on Administrative Policies for Cross-Border Data Transfers Hawaii Enacts AI Companion Disclosure and Safety Law EDPB Calls for Review of EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework After U.S. Supreme Court Decision on FTC Independence CNIL Issues FAQs on Recommendation for Tracking Pixels in Emails European Commission Issues Guidance on the Cyber Resilience Act European Commission Issues EU AI Act Transparency Guidelines EU Digital Omnibus on AI Enters Into Force Connecticut AG Leads Multistate Settlement With 23andMe Over 2023 Data Breach CalPrivacy Targets Gig Economy Tech Platforms in First CCPA Compliance Audit New Jersey Adopts New Data Broker Registration Regime and Sensitive Data Sale and Licensing Restrictions CISA Plans to Finalize Cyber Incident Reporting Regulations in September 2026 Illinois Governor Signs Frontier AI Model Law New Hampshire Amends the NHDPA to Prohibit the Sale of Children’s Personal Data Canada’s Proposed Social Media Ban for Children and Chatbot Regulation: Bill C-34’s Impact on Platforms European Commission Unveils Cybersecurity and AI Action Plan European Commission Refers Four Member States to CJEU Over NIS2 Transposition Delays EDPB Opens Public Consultation on New Personal Data Breach Notification Template
UK ICO Publishes Guidance on Storage and Access Technologies
2026-05-05 · via Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog

On April 29, 2026, the UK Information Commissioner’s Office (“ICO”) published the final updated version of its guidance on storage and access technologies such as cookies, pixels and similar technologies (“Technologies”). The guidance takes into consideration the requirements of the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations, the UK General Data Protection Regulation (“UK GDPR”) and the latest changes introduced by the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 (“DUAA”).  

The guidance sets out the key obligations for organizations when using Technologies, such as when and how to procure consent, and what information individuals must be provided about the use of Technologies. Much of this information was in the ICO’s previous guidance, but the new guidance has introduced further detail on certain points and included new examples. Notably, the new guidance discusses the changes introduced by the DUAA, i.e., the new exceptions to the requirement to obtain consent for the use of Technologies. The two key exceptions are: (1) the “statistical purposes” exception; and (2) the “appearance” exception.

The “Statistical Purposes” Exception

Under this exception, an organization is not required to procure consent to store or access information using Technologies if the sole purpose of the storage or access is to enable the organization to collect information for statistical purposes: (1) about how a service is used, with a view to making improvements to the service, or (2) about how a website by means of which the service is provided is used, with a view to making improvements to the website. To rely on this exception, an organization must still provide information regarding the purposes for which Technologies are used and a “simple and free” means to object to their use.

According to the ICO, this exception is about the creation of aggregate statistical information about visitors to a service and the use of this information to improve the service, i.e., “essentially for analytics purposes.” The ICO caveats this by confirming the exception does not cover all analytics – it is about how the service is used and not about who uses the service. The ICO acknowledges that such activity may involve the processing of personal data, and in such instances, the organization must comply with the UK GDPR and then aggregate the data. The ICO has prepared a table of non-exhaustive examples of activities that are likely to meet the exception, such as total visits to a service, user interactions with pages on a website and how users reached a service. 

With regard to third-party analytics, the law states that the information collected by Technologies should not be shared with a third party “except for the purpose of enabling that other person to assist with making improvements to the service or website.” The ICO has interpreted this as meaning a third-party analytics provider can be used by an organization subject to: (1) the provider acting on behalf of the organization (i.e., as a processor); and (2) the information only being used to help the organization improve its service.

The “Appearance” Exception

Under this exception, an organization is not required to procure consent to store or access information using Technologies if the sole purpose of the storage or access is to enable the organization to: (1) adapt the way the organization’s service appears or functions in line with the subscriber’s or user’s preference; or (2) otherwise enhance the appearance or functionality of the website when displayed on, or accessed by, the subscriber’s or user’s device. As with the above, to rely on this exception an organization must still provide information regarding the purposes for using Technologies and a “simple and free” means to object.

The ICO highlights that this exception is not about adapting the content to display to a user on a service based on any known or inferred interests. The ICO has prepared a table of non-exhaustive examples of activities that are likely to meet the exception, such as identifying the dimensions of a subscriber’s or user’s monitor or screen to enable reconfiguration of a website to adapt to the monitor or screen and remembering the language the subscriber or user selects.

The ICO also confirmed that it is in the process of updating its guidance relating to online advertising, with updates to follow in the coming weeks.

Read the press release and guidance.