惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

L
LangChain Blog
博客园 - 司徒正美
美团技术团队
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
T
Troy Hunt's Blog
S
Schneier on Security
T
The Exploit Database - CXSecurity.com
P
Proofpoint News Feed
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
Cisco Talos Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
T
Tor Project blog
B
Blog
NISL@THU
NISL@THU
月光博客
月光博客
博客园 - 【当耐特】
AWS News Blog
AWS News Blog
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
腾讯CDC
L
Lohrmann on Cybersecurity
The Cloudflare Blog
L
LINUX DO - 最新话题
S
Security @ Cisco Blogs
S
Secure Thoughts
Spread Privacy
Spread Privacy
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
The Last Watchdog
The Last Watchdog
Project Zero
Project Zero
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
Vercel News
Vercel News
H
Hacker News: Front Page
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
Schneier on Security
Schneier on Security
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
Forbes - Security
Forbes - Security
C
CXSECURITY Database RSS Feed - CXSecurity.com
I
InfoQ
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
G
GRAHAM CLULEY
W
WeLiveSecurity
小众软件
小众软件
Recorded Future
Recorded Future
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org

Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog

Louisiana Enacts Comprehensive Consumer Privacy Law Connecticut Signs Comprehensive AI Bill into Law Technology Companies Should Prepare for FTC Enforcement of Take It Down Act HHS Reorganizes Office for Civil Rights Oregon Prohibition on Public Body Disclosures to Data Brokers for Federal Immigration Purposes Now In Effect Connecticut Privacy Law Updates: Data Broker Rules, Geolocation Sale Ban, Surveillance Pricing Restrictions, and Genetic Data Regulations NYDFS Warns of Cybersecurity Risks from Frontier AI Models UK and Australia Announce Memorandum of Understanding on AI Security FTC Announces Settlements With Three Marketing Firms Over Allegations of Deceptive Statements About Active Listening AI-Powered Services Cybersecurity Authorities Issue Joint Guidance on the Adoption of Agentic AI Systems Colorado AI Act Amended and Effective Date Delayed European Commission Releases Draft Guidelines on High-Risk AI Under the EU AI Act Texas AG Announces Lawsuit Against Netflix for Alleged Misrepresentations Regarding User Data UK ICO Recommends Targeted Changes to PECR Rules for Online Advertising California AG Announces Record $12.75M Settlement with GM over CCPA Data Minimization and Purpose Limitation Violations Illinois Department of Human Rights Issues Regulations Governing the Use of AI in Employment Decisions Delta Dental Agrees to $2.25 Million Settlement with NYDFS Over MOVEit Data Breach Response Maryland Enacts First-of-its-Kind Ban on Surveillance Pricing for Grocery Sales UK ICO Publishes Guidance on Storage and Access Technologies CIPL Report Discusses Significant Alignment between GDPR and Global CBPR CalPrivacy Announces the Agenda for its April 30–May 1 Board Meeting CalPrivacy Requests Preliminary Comments on Notices & Disclosures, Employee Data COPPA Rule Amendment Compliance Deadline Approaches House Republicans Introduce Comprehensive Federal Privacy Bill: “SECURE Data Act” Kentucky Classifies Smart TV Data as Sensitive Alabama Becomes 21st State With Comprehensive Consumer Privacy Law CalPrivacy Director Expects CCPA Compliance Audits in 2026 Virginia Bans Sale of Geolocation Data HHS’ Office for Civil Rights Settles HIPAA Investigation of Health Care Software Company New Jersey Enacts New Restrictions on Health Care Facilities’ Use of Patient Data Washington State Enacts Law Regulating AI Companion Chatbots with Private Right of Action Guardrails for Legal AI: What California’s SB 574 Would Require of Attorneys and Arbitrators
China CAC Issues Guidance on Conducting Audits
2026-06-10 · via Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog

On April 29, 2026, China's Cyberspace Administration (“CAC”) released an official Q&A document (only available in Chinese) (the “Guidance”) on personal data audits intended to help data handlers (i.e., controllers) understand and comply with the personal data audit-related framework under Chinese data protection laws (certain of which are listed below).

The Guidance answers several practical questions relating to personal data audits, including how to count the number of individuals whose personal data is being processed, the required frequency of personal data audits, and the content for audits on the processing of children’s personal data. The Guidance details the following:

  • Several key regulations in China (including the Network Data Security Management Regulations, the Personal Information Protection Compliance Audit Management Measures, and the rules on cross-border data transfers) use thresholds based on how many individuals’ personal data a data handler processes. The CAC clarified that these thresholds are inclusive of the stated number (e.g., “more than 10 million” includes exactly 10 million). The count should reflect the number of natural persons whose data is currently being processed. Deleted records are excluded from the count.
  • The Guidance addresses how often data handlers must conduct personal information protection compliance audits. The Personal Information Protection Law (“PIPL”) requires all personal data handlers to conduct regular compliance audits. The Compliance Audit Management Measures set out specific minimum frequencies based on scale: (1) more than 10 million individuals: at least once every two years; (2) between 1 million and 10 million individuals: at least once every three to four years (per national standard guidance); and (3) up to 1 million individuals: at least once every five years. Data handlers are expected to formalize these timelines in an internal compliance audit policy, and may reference the relevant national standards when determining the exact cadence.
  • The Guidance also states what data handlers must cover when auditing how they handle the personal data of minors (defined as individuals under 18 years old under Chinese civil law). Under the Regulations on the Protection of Minors in Cyberspace, any data handler that processes the personal information of minors must conduct a dedicated compliance audit annually (either internally or through an accredited third party) and report the results to the CAC and other relevant authorities. This obligation applies regardless of whether the data handler formally identifies or verifies the status of users as minors. If there is any possibility that the personal data of minors is being processed, the audit requirement is triggered. The scope of such audits should align with PIPL, the Network Data Security Management Regulations, the Provisions on the Protection of Children's Personal Information Online, and the Compliance Audit Management Measures, and may draw on national technical standards for detailed audit criteria.