Jeremy Kyle has sparked hundreds of Ofcom complaints after an explosive rant about junior doctors striking on TalkTV. 

The broadcasting regulator revealed that the show had received 311 complaints following the episode of The Jeremy Kyle Breakfast Show that aired on Saturday (April 11).

During the episode, presenter Jeremy, 60, was seen enraged in a fiery speech over the NHS' junior doctors going on strike - for the 15th time over the past three years. 

Last week, resident doctors began their six-day walkout over jobs and pay after it was revealed their previous strikes cost the NHS £3billion in recent years. 

Tens of thousands of resident doctors - formerly known as junior doctors - joined picket lines at 7am after rejecting a pay deal which would have made them 35.2 per cent better off than four years ago, according to the Health Secretary. 

The strikes came after a government row with the British Medical Association (BMA) over pay and job opportunities, with the BMA's resident doctors' committee rejecting the government's offer, breaking down negotiations.

Reacting to the strikes live on air, Jeremy told viewers: 'Everybody, I think, is beginning to feel very angry about the junior doctors. 

'We all know the BMA is essentially a left-wing organisation and is doing what it can to overthrow this government.

'They tried to overthrow the last government. I'm quite strong on this. I believe there's an argument that says we should tie them to contracts, sack them, and we shouldn't allow them to strike.

'I'm not going to apologise to anybody for this because, again, the latest strike, people will die, people will miss cancer treatments, people will miss operations, it's absolutely disgusting! Try telling alarm clock Britain that 35 per cent isn't enough.'

The show then showed live footage of people outside St Thomas' Hospital in London as the doctors took to the picket line in protest.  

He continued: 'Here's the thing that I think, and I have to be careful, they all look really young, and a lot of them look like they've come into this country to be doctors in the first place.

'Is that an outrageous thing to say? I don't know, I don't mean it to be.

'They could be British-born, they might be doctors who have come over that Boriswave that we know lots of doctors come over, but whatever.

'Whether they've come from abroad or are British-born, I just feel that they're holding the country to ransom now, I just get the feeling.'

The Talk TV presenter then went on to add he was thinking about 'cancer patients' who were unable to get their treatment - as well as others who would suffer due to the six-day strikes.  

Jeremy added, fuming over the footage as it played live: 'Sorry, but I'd sack them all!'

The episode sparked 311 complaints from viewers, as reported by Ofcom. 

Earlier this month, Good Morning Britain was hit by a wave of Ofcom complaints as viewers hit out against presenter Ed Balls for 'political bias' after a 'disgraceful' live clash.

The ITV daytime programme, which Ed, 59, co-hosts alongside Susanna Reid, received 55 complaints for the show broadcast on March 23. 

The TV watchdog confirmed that viewers had reached out to complain, alleging Ed had displayed 'political bias' during the instalment. 

The complaints were sparked by a conversation between the telly host and anti-Semitism campaigned Dov Forman, who appeared on the show following an arson attack on a Jewish charity ambulance fleet. 

Dov, 22, appeared via a video link in Golders Green, London, just hours after four of the charity-owned ambulances were set on fire.   

In the weeks since the Hatzola ambulances were attacked as they parked in a synagogue car park, three men have been charged with arson, intent to damage property and reckless as to endangering life. 

Dov, who is the great-grandson of Holocaust survivor and author Lily Ebert, was seen being quizzed by Ed and Susanna, 55, during his appearance on the show. 

Ed was seen asking: 'When you see last week the shadow Justice Secretary Nick Timothy singling out the mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, for praying in Trafalgar Square in a Muslim group and saying that is wrong and shouldn’t happen, isn’t that the kind of intolerance and divisiveness which is causing problems in the Jewish community right now? Do you condemn that as well?'

Dov responded: 'Well, look, I think the shadow justice secretary was making a point that many people in this country feel about Islamist extremism.

'I won’t get drawn into a debate on whether his words were right or wrong. We are here to talk about the antisemitic attack this morning in the Jewish community.

'Certainly, we need to be careful with our words, but as I say, there are people — including many in the Jewish community – who are worried about the spread of Islamist extremism, which is running rampant across society.'

According to The Sun, the programme later apologised to viewers about the exchange between the pair.

They are reported to have said: 'The intention behind Ed’s question was to ask whether a culture of intolerance was placing Jews at greater risk of harm in the UK. We regret any misunderstanding and apologise for any offence caused.'

However, the comments sparked social media outrage, with viewers taking to X, formerly Twitter, to complain about the line of questioning. 

One penned: 'After an antisemitic attack on a Jewish volunteer ambulance service, you’d expect focused questions about the rise and threat of antisemitism in the UK.

'Instead, he tried to shift the discussion – asking whether criticism of a mass iftar event in Trafalgar Square is “causing problems” for the Jewish community.

'This isn’t balance or insight; it's poor journalism that misses the point and dilutes the seriousness of antisemitism. Well handled by Dov Forman for staying on point.'

Another chimed in: 'Ed Balls is a standing disgrace. He has no business hosting a news programme,' as a third wrote: 'Does Ed Balls even realise how offensive this was on the morning of an antisemitic hate attack against Jews in Golders Green!'

A fourth added: 'What disgraceful whataboutery from Ed Balls,' as a fifth simply called his questioning 'disgusting' while reacting to the interview. 

The Daily Mail has contacted ITV for comment.  

It comes after Ed locked horns with Huw Edwards's publicist, accusing him of 'promoting a paedophile and using bad mental health as an excuse for his crimes' in a toe-curling Good Morning Britain interview.

In March, Barry Tomes spoke to Ed and Susanna Reid about the new Power: The Downfall Of Huw Edwards, which aired on Channel 5.

TV presenter Edwards, 64, who presented the BBC's News At Ten for decades and broke some of the biggest stories including the death of Queen Elizabeth II, pled guilty to making indecent images of children in July 2024. 

Barry approached Edwards and offered to be his publicist without being paid for his services, and explained that six months ago Edwards had told him that he 'wanted to tell his side of the story'. 

Barry explained to the presenters: 'I'm looking for the black box. That's why I am here. I want to find out why this happened. 

'He's not the first famous man to have these issues. There will be more. Unless we can figure out why.' 

He continued: 'I am interested in mental health, for all sorts of family reasons. I think that lots of questions are being asked, but nobody seems to ask why does this happen? Why?' 

Ed said: 'Can I ask you about your decision, there are lots of ways you could support people with mental health issues to understand. But you've chosen in this case, a convicted paedophile, class A images, which he admitted in court, and convicted. 

'In the case of a lawyer, people have a right to defence in law, that is what defence lawyers do.

'Sometimes they will do it pro bono, but you aren't a lawyer, you are a publicist. You have chosen to help and support a convicted paedophile, and I wonder why you would choose Huw Edwards? 

'It's your choice, nobody has made you do this.' 

Barry explained: 'It's my choice. I made that clear, I approached him, he never approached me. Quite simply, I would like to find out why these things happen generally. Why do powerful men do these things.'

Ed then quickly pointed out to Barry: 'But you're not investigating, you're his publicist. You're telling his story.'

'Don't publicists investigate?' Barry replied.

'If you're his publicist and you turn out to reach conclusions that are very negative to him, are you then going to publicise a story that he doesn't want told?' Ed asked him. 

Barry replied: 'I am going to tell the truth, yeah. 100 per cent, and he is aware of that.'

Ed later told him: 'The problem is, he is a paedophile and you are his publicist, which means that you are a publicist for a paedophile. 

'It may be that you have an unusual contract in which you can say what you like independent of what he wants, which is an unusual relationship for a publicist, but Huw Edwards did produce a statement about the documentary, he says his interaction was shameless, reckless and damaging.

'I mean it was worse than that, and then he goes on to I think use his mental illness as a excuse. He goes on to say he hopes that will explain how he behaved.

'Were you comfortable with that statement? Normally a publicist would advise somebody putting a statement out.'

Barry responded: 'I did sit with him,' to which Ed asked: 'So you were happy with that statement?'

Barry told the host: 'I was happy because it was what he wanted to say. I am not asking him to change what he wants to say no more than I would allow him to say to me, "we can't say that Barry".'

Ed replied: 'But you said a moment ago your goal is to get to the truth. Not to simply tell his side of the story. 

'Therefore, if you as his publicist, are publicising a statement which is his words, my assumption is that you wouldn't have signed off those words, promoted them yourself, unless you were happy with those words.' 

Barry responded: 'They are his words, as far as I am concerned, what he wants to say. I haven't published them, promoted them, I've distributed them.

'If I send it to 1,000 people, they all think it's horrific and don't publish it, that's fine.

'I haven't asked anybody to do it. I think did he not promote his book at the end?' 

When asked if he thought if a suspended sentence was enough, Barry said: 'I don't have enough knowledge. My instinct is, it's the only thing I can work with. The law took its process. I believe in the law. I believe in the courts.' 

Barry also explained that when he sits down with Edwards, one of the questions he wants answered is if he is going to give back the £200,000 salary to the BBC. 

'I wouldn't pay it back. He had a contract, his contract was terminated and he was paid,' he told Susanna and Ed.

'If they think they should have it back, have they started legal proceedings? Not sure. But I personally wouldn't, no.'

The Jeremy Kyle Breakfast Show airs mornings on TalkTV