惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
Vercel News
Vercel News
Y
Y Combinator Blog
D
DataBreaches.Net
IT之家
IT之家
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
博客园_首页
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
H
Help Net Security
GbyAI
GbyAI
C
Check Point Blog
L
LangChain Blog
小众软件
小众软件
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
G
Google Developers Blog
月光博客
月光博客
V
V2EX
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
博客园 - 叶小钗

Cryptology ePrint Archive

Fast Isogeny Evaluation on Binary Curves Quick Draw Queries: Lightweight Searchable Public-key Ciphertexts with Hidden Structures via Non-Interactive Key Exchange A Constructive Treatment of Authentication Boolean Arithmetic over $\mathbb{F}_2$ from Group Commutators HAWK with Hint: Algebraic Key Recovery from Side-Channel Leakage Post-Quantum Secure k-Times Traceable Ring Signature A Key Schedule Design and Evaluation under Boundary Round-Key Leakage 2G2T: Constant-Size, Statistically Sound MSM Outsourcing Proximity Signatures Breaking Optimized HQC: The First Cache-Timing Full Decryption Oracle Key-Recovery Attack in Post-Quantum Cryptography Efficient Partially Blind Signatures from Isogenies PipeSC: A Resource-efficient and Pipelined Hardware Accelerator for Sumcheck Protocol Evaluating PQC KEMs, Combiners, and Cascade Encryption via Adaptive IND-CPA Testing Using Deep Learning High-Throughput Side-Channel-Protected Stream Cipher Hardware for 6G Systems Efficient e = 3 Threshold RSA via Integer Coordinates for Intel SGX Zeal: PIR for Non-Cooperative Databases VEIL: Lightweight Zero-Knowledge for Hash-Based Multilinear Proof Systems Witness-Indistinguishable Arguments of Knowledge and One-Way Functions The many faces of Schnorr: a touch-up Open Problems in List Decoding and Correlated Agreement Compressed Key Exchange Protocol from Orientations of Large Discriminant Using AVX-512 SPLASH: SPeculative Leakage-Adaptive Secure Hardware An Efficient Identity-Based Blind Signature Scheme from SM9 Efficient Batch Threshold Encryption Using Partial Fraction Techniques A note on the Unsuitability of LIGA for Linkable Ring Signatures: The perils of non-commutativity Verification Facade: Masquerading Insecure Cryptographic Implementations as Verified Code Cryptographic Implications of Worst-Case Hardness of Time-Bounded Kolmogorov Complexity Efficient Merkle-Tree Consistent Accumulator FLOSS: Fast Linear Online Secret-Shared Shuffling Applications of Bruhat-Chevalley-Renner Decomposition to Metric-Aware Code-Based Cryptography
Which Privacy Blanket is Optimal in the Shuffle Model?
Pengcheng Su, Peking University · 2026-04-06 · via Cryptology ePrint Archive

Paper 2026/667

Which Privacy Blanket is Optimal in the Shuffle Model?

Haibo Cheng, Peking University

Ping Wang, Peking University

Abstract

In recent years, the shuffle model has emerged as a prevalent paradigm in privacy-preserving data analysis, centered on the principle of \textit{privacy amplification via shuffling}: an individual user's report is obscured by the ``background noise'' of other users' messages, a phenomenon intuitively known as the \textit{privacy blanket}. This paper initiates a foundational and systematic study of this mechanism from an information-theoretic perspective. We investigate the following optimal noise-design problem: given that a target user's message $Y_1$ follows a distribution $P$, what is the optimal blanket noise distribution $Q$ that maximizes privacy? Specifically, when $Y_1 \sim P$ and the remaining messages $Y_2, \dots, Y_n \stackrel{\text{i.i.d.}}{\sim} Q$ are shuffled to produce an output $\boldsymbol{Z} = (Y_{\sigma(i)})_{i=1}^n$, we seek the $Q$ that affords the strongest protection for $Y_1$ under various metrics, including mutual information $I(Y_1; \mathbf{Z})$, total-variation-information $I_{\mathrm{TV}}(Y_1; \mathbf{Z})$, message recovery advantage, and expected posterior variance. Our analysis reveals a series of non-intuitive results that challenge the conventional heuristic of setting $Q=P$. First, we prove that the optimal noise distribution $Q$ generally \textit{deviates} from the target distribution $P$. For binary alphabets, we show that the (near-)uniform distribution is optimal in a strong sense. For general finite alphabets, we derive an explicit analytical form $Q \propto \sqrt{P(1-P)}$ that achieves asymptotic optimality for mutual information. Furthermore, we demonstrate that our analytical framework transcends the shuffle model, yielding new security insights into broader cryptographic primitives such as the \textit{ideal cipher model} and \textit{honey encryption}. Finally, we extend our results to the shuffle-DP paradigm, where messages $Y_i = \mathcal{R}(X_i)$ are outputs of $\varepsilon_0$-locally differentially private mechanisms. We establish a new, tight information-theoretic upper bound $I(X_1; \mathbf{Z} \mid (X_i)_{i=2}^n) \le \frac{(e^{\varepsilon_0/2}-1)^2}{2n} + \mathcal{O}(n^{-3/2})$. This result provides a sharp characterization that matches the optimal privacy-amplification parameters known in the literature, while offering a novel interpretation of the shuffling gain.

BibTeX

@misc{cryptoeprint:2026/667,
      author = {Pengcheng Su and Haibo Cheng and Ping Wang},
      title = {Which Privacy Blanket is Optimal in the Shuffle Model?},
      howpublished = {Cryptology {ePrint} Archive, Paper 2026/667},
      year = {2026},
      url = {https://eprint.iacr.org/2026/667}
}