





















3 Min Read

World Images via Alamy Stock Photo
Vast mountains of often unstructured data can become easier to surmount with AI’s assistance. AI helps CIOs move faster by processing large volumes of data and accelerating insight into how business actually operates, said Michael Wetzel, CIO at risk and compliance firm Netwrix. "The value comes when AI is applied to real business problems, not technology for its own sake."
One problem AI can help tackle is observability across the organization. When AI is grounded in identity and data security, leaders can see how people, systems, and data interact, Wetzel noted. "Since identity defines how employees show up, collaborate, and contribute, starting with identity allows CIOs to better understand risk, access, and behavior across the organization.”
AI has become very effective at identifying interesting patterns and anomalies in data, something that was difficult to do earlier without building specialized analytics tools, said Vaibhav Kumar Bajpai, a group engineering manager at Microsoft Core AI. "Today, leaders can ask AI to predict outcomes based on existing data patterns and get answers in minutes instead of days."
Related:InformationWeek Podcast: Catching hidden errors in AI-powered code
It's important to remember that AI should never be used to replace people -- it should augment them, Wetzel said. "Humans bring context, intuition, and judgment, but they can't analyze data at the same scale or speed as AI," he explained. "AI can continuously process information and surface patterns, allowing users to focus on higher-order thinking, decision making, and problem-solving."
Humans are brilliant, but they get tired, observed Eric Poff, CTO at AI technology developer Vurvey Labs. "AI is tireless and consistent," he said. "AI can help eliminate the volume-versus-quality trade-off by operating at scale while maintaining quality." This also means that AI insights are generally more consistent. Humans can have bad days, leading to inconsistent results. "AI, however, is capable of providing consistent, deterministic outputs when constructed properly," Poff said.
Where AI adds clear value is in its ability to synthesize large volumes of data into concise, well-structured insights quickly, Bajpai said. "It can organize detailed data points, highlight key drivers, and present explanations in a consistent format that would take humans much longer to produce." In many cases, AI-based insights are grounded in recognized data sources and references, which helps establish credibility. "Used correctly, AI complements human expertise by accelerating analysis rather than replacing it," he said.
Related:Ask the Experts: The red flags that signal an AI project isn't worth pursuing
The biggest mistake CIOs make is using AI without establishing a clear business purpose or understanding how it will impact people, Wetzel said. "Some organizations focus too much on security controls or technology while losing sight of the employee experience," he noted. Other enterprises may move too fast, leading to the creation of shadow AI tools lacking appropriate visibility or governance. "The right approach is to start with how people work, then layer in security and AI thoughtfully," Wetzel advised.
For the last few years, the AI narrative was dominated by unstructured data and generative tasks such as summarizing emails, writing code, or generating images, Poff said. "AI can unlock new insights by performing translations between business intent and structured data; effectively bridging the 'what' and the 'why,'" he explained. Poff added that structured data tells users what happened, while unstructured data tells them why. "AI can look at both simultaneously, providing insight you simply can't get from a static dashboard."
The usefulness of AI tools depends heavily on how well they are trained on the right data and how rigorously they are evaluated against real-world use cases, Bajpai said. "Having worked on AI evaluation for many years, I've seen that the real value of these tools comes from thorough testing, such as A/B testing, in production scenarios tied to specific user needs," he said. "In practice, an AI tool using less powerful models -- but tested extensively for a defined use case -- can outperform a more powerful large language model that has not been evaluated with the same rigor."
Related:Shutterstock CTO's playbook for scaling AI without vendor sprawl
Technology Journalist & Author
John Edwards is a veteran business technology journalist. His work has appeared in The New York Times, The Washington Post, and numerous business and technology publications, including Computerworld, CFO Magazine, IBM Data Management Magazine, RFID Journal, and Electronic Design. He has also written columns for The Economist's Business Intelligence Unit and PricewaterhouseCoopers' Communications Direct. John has authored several books on business technology topics. His work began appearing online as early as 1983. Throughout the 1980s and 90s, he wrote daily news and feature articles for both the CompuServe and Prodigy online services. His "Behind the Screens" commentaries made him the world's first known professional blogger.
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理,仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。