By Rajesh Ganesan, CEO of ManageEngine.
getty
Many AI conversations build on a common misconception: “If we choose the right model, everything else will fall into place.”
It’s an understandable assumption. The headlines focus on models. The breakthroughs focus on models. The demos focus on models. But in enterprise environments, the model is rarely the bottleneck.
The real determinant of AI success is something far less glamorous: data strategy.
To extract durable advantages from AI, organizations must extend their data strategy beyond enterprise architecture, governance, security and other traditional considerations. Now, their data strategy must also unify the multiple systems of records that feed their generative and agentic AI.
One of the best ways to do that is through a common data platform. This is a tightly integrated, permission-aware platform that allows intelligence to operate reliably at scale.
A common data platform isn't simply a data lake or a reporting engine. It’s a unified data plane that consolidates operational, security, identity and workflow data into a shared architecture. It maintains consistent schemas and metadata, enforces identity-aware permissions, preserves auditability and governance controls and enables real-time interoperability across systems.
In practical terms, a common data platform ensures that the truth about your enterprise is accessible, consistent and controlled. This platform becomes the foundation on which workflows, intelligence and outcomes are built.
In the early stages of digital transformation, features mattered. Organizations evaluated tools based on functionality. Today, integration matters more than features.
AI systems don't operate in isolation. They draw from multiple data sources, trigger workflows across departments, depend on identity context and must comply with governance policies. Integration is the key to enabling intelligence.
When integration is weak, AI recommendations are informed by incomplete data, automations trigger without awareness of related constraints, decision-support tools lack cross-functional visibility and governance teams can't trace how outputs were generated. Conversely, when integration is strong, AI recommendations reflect full operational context, permissions are enforced consistently, observability spans domains and decisions become explainable and auditable.
Digital maturity can be understood in two layers. The reliability layer includes systems of records and systems of workflows: the truth and motion of the enterprise. The differentiation layer includes systems of experiences and systems of intelligence, where innovation and competitive advantage emerge.
A common data platform strengthens the reliability layer. Without reliability, differentiation collapses under pressure. You can build advanced AI capabilities, but those capabilities will struggle to scale if your infrastructure lacks unified data, strong identity controls and cross-domain visibility.
A strong common data platform rests on several structural pillars:
1. It requires a unified data plane in which core systems (service management, endpoint telemetry, security events, identity signals and observability data) feed into a shared architecture. This reduces competing truths and ambiguity.
2. It depends on a robust identity trust fabric. Every interaction, whether human or non-human, must be permission-aware. The platform needs to understand who or what is acting and under what authority, which becomes increasingly important as AI agents operate alongside employees.
3. Governance must be built in by design. Audit trails, policy enforcement, compliance frameworks and explainability mechanisms should be embedded directly into the data layer rather than added reactively.
4. Interoperability must be deliberate. APIs, workflow orchestration frameworks and integration standards allow systems to communicate consistently and predictably, reducing ad hoc connections.
5. Observability must span domains. Data from logs, metrics, alerts and transactions should be correlated within a unified framework so that situational awareness becomes systemic rather than fragmented.
Together, these elements create an environment where intelligence operates with context, security and scale.
Once you recognize the need for a common data platform, you may build it internally or purchase a platform solution, depending on your organization’s size, scale and vertical.
Building internally offers full architectural control and the ability to customize the platform to match unique business models. It also ensures ownership of intellectual property and integration strategy. However, it demands sustained engineering investment, introduces ongoing maintenance complexity, risks inconsistency across teams and typically extends time to value.
Purchasing a platform accelerates deployment, provides preintegrated capabilities and reduces the maintenance burden through vendor-supported governance models. Yet, it may constrain customization, introduce vendor dependency and require internal processes to align with the platform’s design philosophy.
Both approaches can succeed. The determining factor is clarity of integration strategy and long-term architectural discipline. The more important question, however, is whether integration is deliberate.
Many organizations operate in a hybrid state where partially custom-built systems are combined with vendor tools and loosely connected through scripts and point integrations. This environment might function adequately in the early stages of digital maturity. It rarely scales well into AI-driven autonomy.
A common data platform forces clarity around critical questions: What is the source of truth? How do systems communicate? How is identity enforced? How is governance embedded? How is observability maintained across domains?
These aren’t purely technical considerations. They’re also strategic decisions that shape long-term competitive advantage.
Technology leaders have always known the importance of a sound data strategy. But in the past, they could afford compromises like maintaining multiple data silos pieced together with third-party tools. Now, a watertight data strategy is becoming foundational to AI leverage, and smart leaders realize they have a great opportunity to establish infrastructure as the true advantage to deliver on AI objectives and outcomes.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理，仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。