Dax Grant is the CEO of Global Transform and an authority on C-suite leadership. Global 100 CIO, 100 Women to Watch, CREA Global Award List.
getty
For decades, businesses competed on price, product and prestige. Today, when I speak with executives, there is a recognition that principle is rapidly reshaping markets. While price determines affordability, product dictates quality and prestige captures status, principle reflects the values guiding business decisions and attracting like-minded customers.
Gen-Z and younger millennials are beyond just buying products; they are buying beliefs. They choose brands that reflect their values, prioritizing how people are treated throughout the supply chain.
In an automated, AI-driven world, the next generation asks who benefits from each business model. This includes employees, suppliers, partners, logistics providers and the communities they support. A focus on how businesses treat people, from employees to global supply chains, has become a primary factor shaping commercial strategy and reputation.
While I recognize from experience that boardrooms often celebrate cost reductions from artificial intelligence and outsourcing, younger consumers are shifting loyalty to businesses that create jobs, protect communities and use technology ethically. They are expressing their choices through their purchasing decisions. This approach is not anti-technology; it is pro-human. Firms that recognize this distinction will succeed.
Today, ethical consumerism encompasses more than its earlier focus. A decade ago, ethical consumerism focused on sustainability, fair trade and cutting environmental harm. While these remain important, younger consumers now also value labor ethics, workforce responsibility, supply chain transparency and economic impact. A Thomson Reuters Institute study found 81% Gen-Z consumers have changed purchasing decisions based on company actions/reputation, and highlights concern about ethical labor practices.
They care whether a company creates meaningful employment or replaces teams with software solely to increase margins. They want clarity about where products are made, who makes them and whether suppliers are treated fairly. They recognize when leadership uses "efficiency" as authentic innovation or as a euphemism for redundancy. Deloitte’s Gen-Z and millennial survey found younger consumers expect companies to balance profit with social responsibility.
They question whether AI is used to empower people or to eliminate jobs.
Brand loyalty must now be continually earned rather than assumed. A company can lose years of trust with a single announcement about layoffs, exploitative sourcing or supplier misconduct, even while celebrating change and expansion. Consumers see the contradiction.
Consumers recognize that these contradictions no longer stop at the office door. Consumers understand that a brand’s true story often begins far from headquarters, in factories, warehouses, farms and service networks. They are asking more challenging questions:
• Are suppliers paid fairly?
• Are jobs being protected locally, or are they exported solely to increase profit margins?
• Is procurement focused only on the lowest bid or on building responsible partnerships?
• Does technology strengthen resilience along the supply chain, or does it pressure smaller operators for short-term gain?
The next generation views supply chain decisions as moral choices. A company cannot present itself as purpose-driven while relying on exploitative work practices elsewhere. Transparency now makes this impossible. Supply chain strategy is integral to brand strategy.
Artificial intelligence is one of the most important technological shifts of our lifetime. AI is helping increase productivity, accelerate decision-making and eliminate repetitive tasks that do not require human talent. The problem is not AI. The issue arises when businesses equate automation with leadership. There is a clear distinction between using AI to enhance human potential and using it to avoid investing in people. One creates growth. The other creates distrust.
Next-generation consumers recognize this distinction. A firm that uses AI to help employees deliver better service and achieve stronger outcomes is viewed as progressive. A firm that uses AI primarily to cut jobs and increase executive compensation is seen as extractive.
Communities support companies that invest in them. Businesses that keep jobs local, invest in skills and create career progression build loyal ecosystems. The same applies to supplier choices. Supporting regional suppliers and responsible partners builds greater resilience than pursuing the lowest cost without accountability.
Employees become customers. Customers become advocates. Advocates become growth channels. This approach constitutes a strategic choice, not an act of charity. It is a deliberate strategy. Trust, like financial capital, accumulates over time and can markedly increase a business’ long-term value. Especially in uncertain times, people seek confidence before purchasing products.
The firms that will lead in the next decade will not necessarily be those with the most AI use cases. Successful firms will answer the question: How does your technology improve human lives? This answer must be evident in hiring, leadership, investment, procurement and customer experience. The future favors firms that combine innovation with responsibility. Not human versus machine.
Humans with the most forward-thinking companies will not position AI as a replacement. They will present AI as reinforcement. The next generation does not choose between advancement and ethics. They expect both. If neither is present, they will choose other options. That is the real market disruption: not artificial intelligence but human expectation.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理，仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。