
























Artificial intelligence protest sticker reading "Pop the AI Bubble" on a concrete column outside offices of OpenAI, San Francisco, California, March 25, 2026. (Photo by Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images)
Gado via Getty Images
A price war is coming for the AI industry, and it’s arriving long before any bubble bursts. As enterprises slam the brakes on runaway token spending, OpenAI and Anthropic are being pushed into steep price cuts that could compress margins, reshape their looming trillion‑dollar IPOs and ripple across the entire AI supply chain — cuts that target the tokens, the four‑character word fragments that underpin their business models, according to the Wall Street Journal.
Why cut prices? Enterprises that subscribe to ChatGPT and Claude increasingly say the price is too high. A case in point is Uber, which consumed its 2026 AI coding budget in four months, reported Fortune. With per-engineer costs for Claude Code and Cursor ranging from $500 to $2,000 a month, Uber now caps usage at $1,500 monthly per tool.
These budget caps could make businesses pay more attention to their return on AI spending — or lack thereof. After all, questions about the payoff from AI are not new. I wrote about the absence of a killer app for AI in September 2024.
Recent studies suggest scant evidence of a return on AI investment. How so? 95% of enterprise generative AI pilots deliver no measurable profit within six months, noted MIT’s 2025 GenAI Divide study.
The lack of payoff affects decision-makers who pay for AI. “If you’re not actually able to draw a direct line to useful features and functionality you’re shipping to your users, that trade becomes harder to justify,” Uber COO Andrew Macdonald said on The Future of Finance Podcast.
If more companies start questioning the value of those big AI budgets, the pain will spread. OpenAI and Anthropic may have to accept lower margins and cut their IPO price. Hyperscalers might switch from Nvidia to buy chips from rivals that charge less. Hyperscalers could receive lower revenue from AI chatbot providers. And neoclouds like CoreWeave may have more trouble repaying their debts.
The market for tokens is huge and growing — but that growth reflects demand accelerating as prices plunge. Spending on AI models will roughly double from $15.5 billion in 2025 to $32.6 billion in 2026, per Gartner.
Anthropic drives faster growth. Its annualized first-quarter 2026 revenue rose fivefold to $45 billion from roughly $9 billion at the end of 2025, according to Sacra.
Demand for tokens is rising so fast that price cuts have a less negative effect on revenue growth — and may even encourage more demand. Token consumption is forecast to rise 24-fold by 2030, to 120 quadrillion tokens a month, projects Goldman Sachs Research, which notes chipmakers are lowering annual token costs by 60% to 70%.
Simply put, volume growth is running at twice spend growth as per-token prices fall. Business token usage grew 1,001% from January 2025 to April 2026, while spend jumped 497%, reported Ramp.
AI is not paying off for many companies, with agentic AI proving especially wasteful. In April, companies had already gone three times over their annual token budgets due to agentic AI, “which makes dozens of token-burning calls per task,” noted The FinOps Foundation. Another problem: For every 10 hours AI saves, employees lose nearly four fixing its output, found Workday.
While individual productivity gains are significant — as high as fivefold — generative AI’s ROI remains elusive. A mere 29% of organizations see significant ROI from generative AI, and just 23% from agents, noted Writer’s 2026 enterprise survey.
A more optimistic take comes from Boston Consulting Group, which claims 25% of its 2025 revenue came from AI-related services. So-called AI visionaries generated 1.7 times more revenue growth than laggards, only 6% of executives would cut AI investment even if 2026 returns disappoint, and agentic workflows capable of true labor substitution are on the way, noted BCG’s AI Radar.
Token price cuts have already happened, and more could be on the way. Anthropic cut Claude Opus pricing 67% at the Opus 4.5 launch in November 2025, and OpenAI already offers Flex processing at a 50% discount.
While the magnitude of future token price cuts remains unknown, their damage to participants throughout the AI industry value chain could be significant. Here’s how:
Lower token prices could boost consumption, or AI’s limited ROI could drive companies to cut back.
A token price war could mean a lower valuation for OpenAI and Anthropic. But if consumption rises, AI capital expenditures could keep climbing even as chip demand shifts from Nvidia to custom silicon providers that supply the cheapest cost per token.
If demand drops, thin AI chatbot margins will narrow further, the $700 billion AI data-center buildout will search more urgently for revenue, and a trillion-dollar-scale debt stack priced in tokens could put borrowers and lenders at greater risk.
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理,仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。