Backstage, tools or camera equipment closeup for creative photoshoot, recording or content capture. Filmmaking, studio and technology for professional photography, multimedia or magazine production

getty

Is the creator economy a content industry or an acquirable asset class? Unilever just answered.

Unilever CEO Fernando Fernandez recently disclosed that the company has scaled its direct creator network from 10,000 to 300,000 in just two years, with roughly half of its digital budget now flowing into social-first, creator-led content.

Most of the coverage framed it as a marketing milestone, perhaps the death knell for agencies. Actually, it is something bigger: a structural signal that the creator economy has crossed from a content industry into an acquirable asset class.

The underlying numbers support the shift. Goldman Sachs projects the creator economy will reach $480 billion by 2027, up from roughly $250 billion today. The 2026 Creator Economy M&A Report from Quartermast Advisors documented 81 closed transactions in 2025, a 17.4% year-over-year increase, led by landmark deals including Bending Spoons’ $1.38 billion acquisition of Vimeo, Later’s $250 million purchase of Mavely, and Publicis Groupe’s $175 million acquisition of Captiv8.

The debate over whether the creator economy is a real asset class is over. The question now is which assets inside it will command institutional multiples, and which will be left behind.

1. Why Unilever’s Move Is An M&A Leading Indicator

When a consumer brand of Unilever’s scale restructures 50% of its digital budget around creator-led distribution, it validates the supply side of the category. Agencies, holding companies, and PE-backed rollups take note. They want infrastructure they can plug into that pipeline, and the fastest way to acquire it is to buy creator-economy businesses that already have it built.

Unilever is not alone. Non-endemic buyers from CPG, food, and retail are increasingly entering the space as strategic acquirers, according to Quartermast’s 2026 forecast. The rationale is straightforward: creators now function as distribution engines, not just influencers. Owning the infrastructure behind them is cheaper than renting it indefinitely.

The market data reflects this. Software businesses accounted for 25.9% of all creator economy acquisitions in 2025, the largest segment by a wide margin, followed by agencies at 21%, media companies at 16%, and talent management firms at 13.6%. Recurring revenue and audience ownership are what buyers pay premium multiples for, not follower counts.

2. The Valuation Gap Most Creators Don’t See

According to Quartermast Advisors’ 2026 report, current valuation multiples in the category show a wide spread:

- Agencies: 5.3x to 9.2x EBITDA

- Media companies: 8.0x to 17.0x EBITDA

- Software platforms: 3.2x to 10.7x ARR

Where a creator business lands on that spread is almost entirely a function of infrastructure, not audience size. A talent-dependent agency with project-based revenue prices at the low end. An agency of record with 12-month guaranteed brand commitments and 20–25% net margins prices at the high end. A software-enabled business with recurring revenue can exceed both ranges.

Most creator businesses currently built on platform distribution, even those generating seven and eight figures, fall outside these valuation bands entirely. Without owned IP, recurring revenue, and clean operational infrastructure, they are categorized as talent, not as enterprises. Talent is licensed. Enterprises are acquired.

3. What Acquirers Are Actually Buying

The professionalization Unilever’s network represents is mirrored on the acquisition side. Three categories now account for the majority of institutional interest.

Owned audience and commerce. Platforms that convert attention into directly monetizable transactions, such as Mavely’s affiliate infrastructure, Later’s scheduling and analytics stack, command premium valuations because they operationalize creator distribution for buyers that could not build it organically.

Recurring-revenue software. SaaS-style tools serving creators generate predictable ARR, which is the multiple-expansion mechanism institutional buyers are most fluent in pricing. The Publicis–Captiv8 deal illustrates the thesis: a 15-million-creator network combined with measurable attribution commands a premium because it links creator strategy directly to sales outcomes.

IP-rich media. Owned content catalogs, characters, formats, and trademarked brands that survive the founder stepping off camera. This category produces the widest valuation spread 8.0x to 17.0x EBITDA because institutional buyers pay aggressively for assets with licensing optionality and cross-platform durability.

What these categories share is the elimination of key person risk, the single largest valuation discount applied to creator businesses in diligence. When the founder stops being the product, the business runs whether the camera is on or off. That is the structural line between a high-paying job and an acquirable enterprise.

4. An Attorney’s Perspective

As counsel to some of the largest creators in the world on IP, M&A, and exit strategy, I have seen this shift play out across inbound deal flow over the last 18 months. The questions sophisticated acquirers ask have moved from audience metrics to infrastructure: who owns the characters, the handles, and the catalog; whether work-for-hire agreements were executed cleanly across years of contract talent; whether the core team is properly classified as W-2 employees or whether the business is sitting on $25,000-per-worker misclassification exposure.

Deals close when those answers were buttoned up two years before the term sheet arrived. Deals collapse in diligence when founders assumed their channel was the asset.

The creators who will benefit most from the Unilever cycle are not the 300,000 inside the pipeline. They are the founders who use enterprise spend from this cycle to finance their transition off of rented platforms and into owned inventory: email lists, community infrastructure, trademarked IP, and recurring-revenue products, before the next M&A wave arrives.

Those rented platforms are facing their own structural accountability pressure, as I examined in my prior analysis of the Meta $6 million verdict on addictive design. The legal shield that protected platform design for two decades is cracking, which compounds the risk of building a business entirely on top of it.

What Founder-Led Brands Should Do Now:

1. Audit ownership at the asset level. Handles, trademarks, catalog rights, characters, and formats. Informal ownership fails diligence.

2. Clean the chain of title. Work-for-hire agreements, contractor classifications, and music licensing are the three most common diligence killers in creator-economy M&A.

3. Build off rented platforms. Owned email lists, community infrastructure, and recurring-revenue products carry materially higher valuation weight than platform-dependent audiences. Become an owner, not a tenant on rented land.

4. Engineer recurring revenue. Software, memberships, licensing, and directory models compound in valuation multiples in ways ad-supported or sponsorship-dependent revenue does not.

5. Document the operating spine.Clean financials, proper entity structure, and defensible IP ownership convert a business from talent into an enterprise.

The Bottom Line For Leaders

Unilever’s 300,000-creator network is a demand-side signal. The 81 closed M&A transactions in 2025, and the multiples attached to them, are the supply-side signal. Read together, they define the next phase of the creator economy: a founder-led consolidation cycle in which the creators who professionalized early become the acquirers’ preferred targets, and the rest are absorbed into enterprise pipelines as interchangeable inventory.

The debate over whether the creator economy is a real asset class is over. The only question that matters now is which side of the transaction you are building for.

Content is king. IP is queen. Own the board.