惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

GbyAI
GbyAI
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
A
About on SuperTechFans
小众软件
小众软件
博客园_首页
博客园 - 聂微东
罗磊的独立博客
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
U
Unit 42
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
博客园 - 叶小钗
V
V2EX
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
IT之家
IT之家
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
博客园 - Franky
D
DataBreaches.Net
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI

Wiz Blog | RSS feed

Meet Wiz for M365: Bringing SaaS into the Security Graph Bringing Security Visibility to Vercel with Wiz Axios NPM Distribution Compromised in Supply Chain Attack Tracking TeamPCP: Investigating Post-Compromise Attacks Seen in the Wild The Wiz Blue Agent, now Generally Available Beyond the Badge: What Achieving Microsoft’s Certified Software Designation Means for Your Cloud Security Introducing the Green Agent: AI-Powered Remediation for the Cloud Three’s a Crowd: TeamPCP trojanizes LiteLLM in Continuation of Campaign KICS GitHub Action Compromised: TeamPCP Strikes Again in Supply Chain Attack Introducing the Wiz Red Agent- AI-Powered Attacker Introducing Wiz AI Application Protection Platform (AI-APP) Introducing Wiz Agents & Workflows: Security at the Speed of AI AI Runtime Threat Detection: From Input to Real-World Impact Trivy Compromised: Everything You Need to Know about the Latest Supply Chain Attack It’s Official: Wiz Joins Google Understanding and Reducing AI Risk in Modern Applications Introducing Wiz Tenant Manager: Multi-Tenant Management for Federated Organizations The Agile FedRAMP Playbook, Part 4: Reactive Risk Management through Enriched Incident Response Wiz Achieves CPSTIC Certification in Spain Seeing AI Clearly: Building Visibility Across Modern AI Applications The Agile FedRAMP Playbook, Part 3: Preventative Risk Management by building Secure by Design Wiz Leads the 2026 Latio Application Security Report with awards in 4 categories Building an Agentic Cloud Security Ecosystem: A Reference Architecture with Wiz MCP and Infosys Cyber Next The Agile FedRAMP Playbook, Part 2: Proactive Risk Management with Continuous Monitoring Cloud-native Security for your Windows environment: Announcing the Wiz Runtime Sensor for Windows Would You Click ‘Accept’? Automatically detecting malicious Azure OAuth applications using LLMs Wiz Named a Leader in The Forrester Wave™: Cloud Native Application Protection Solutions, Q1 2026 From Detection to Remediation: It’s Time to Rethink AppSec Around Exploitability and Root Cause Fixes The Agile FedRAMP Playbook, Part 1: Why Risk is Your Best Starting Point Introducing AI Cyber Model Arena: A Real-World Benchmark for AI Agents in Cybersecurity
Introducing the Cloud Threat Landscape, a new TI resource...
Amitai Cohen, Alon Schindel · 2024-01-24 · via Wiz Blog | RSS feed

The Cloud Threat Landscape from Wiz

At Wiz Research, a core part of our job is studying threat activity targeting public cloud environments, to understand how adversaries do what they do. We use this knowledge to shape our product roadmap and build stronger defenses for our customers through preventive and detective security controls. To this end, for a while now we’ve been maintaining an internal threat intelligence database covering security incidents and campaigns where cloud environments were compromised or put at risk. Our database has reached a point where we think it might be useful to make it publicly available, so that’s what we’re doing today. 

The Wiz Cloud Threat Landscape (available at threats.wiz.io) is a curated public instance of our internal cloud threat intelligence database, summarizing information about publicly disclosed security incidents and campaigns, offering insights into targeting patterns, initial access methods, and effective impact. Our database also lists threat actors known to have targeted cloud environments in particular, as well as those we estimate to target the cloud opportunistically. For actors of special interest, we’ve included concise profiles of their activity — to shed light on their potential motivations and victimology and to aid cloud customers in risk assessment and threat modeling. 

Beyond threat actors and the incidents attributed to them, we regularly document the various tools in their arsenal (ranging from penetration testing utilities to bespoke malware), and techniques they’ve been observed using (mapped to MITRE ATT&CK and ATLAS tactics wherever possible). Additionally, we keep a record of the technologies that threat actors prefer to target for initial access or data exfiltration, often achieved by exploiting vulnerabilities or misconfigurations that affect them. We rank these technologies by how commonly they appear to be involved in cyber activity against the cloud, and measure how prevalent they are among cloud environments, while considering other factors such as whether they are affected by vulnerabilities included in CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog (KEV). All this contributes to providing a good picture of the effective attack surface of the cloud. 

As mentioned above, the main focus of our research is on threat activity known to impact public cloud environments, but we also analyze threats against CI/CD systems and source code management systems, and any potential threat to servers in general, since our adversaries don’t discriminate between self-hosted and cloud-hosted machines (so neither should we). 

The Cloud Threat Landscape is a work in progress (and always will be), and currently covers threat activity ranging between 2019 and the current day. However, we believe that it can already serve as a useful public resource in its current state, and we intend to continuously fill in the gaps in our knowledge, expand our coverage of historical incidents, and add more details to existing records. Moreover, we will incorporate our analysis of newly discovered threats as they emerge. 

In our view, the added value of the Cloud Threat Landscape for infosec practitioners lies in its hyper-focus on cloud threats, whereas other public databases are more general and don't necessarily cover all cloud threats. Furthermore, the database provides a holistic and interconnected view of the relationships between the various elements of threat activity, whereas other public databases usually provide an in-depth view of only one of these aspects. Every entry in the Cloud Threat Landscape is backed by references to our own public reporting as well as high-quality external sources of information such as breaches.cloud, Malpedia, hackingthe.cloud, MITRE ATT&CK, and many others

We hope this platform proves useful for other threat researchers and for the cloud security community at large. If you’d like to contact Wiz Research about this project, please don’t hesitate to reach out at threat.hunters@wiz.io